Bhargavan Rexeena, Philip Frenny Ann, Km Jagathnath Krishna, Augustine Paul, Thomas Shaji
Department of Surgical Services, Regional Cancer Centre Thiruvananthapuram (Trivandrum), Medial College Complex, Kerala, 695011 India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Regional Cancer Centre Thiruvananthapuram (Trivandrum), Medial College Complex, Kerala, 695011 India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;15(4):938-945. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-01995-x. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
Multiple pre-operative risk assessment scores are available for risk stratification of cancer patients undergoing surgery. This is the first study comparing commonly used preoperative risk assessment tools of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale (ECOG) and American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Scale (ASA PS) with frailty scores of Modified Frailty Index (MFI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). This is a prospective observational study of adult cancer patients undergoing oncosurgery in a tertiary cancer center over one year. Pre-operative risk stratification was done using CFS, MFI, ASA PS, and ECOG scales. All patients were followed up postoperatively for 30 days, and complications were documented. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. value of ≤0.05 was considered significant. Of the 4107 patients studied, 12.6% had prolonged hospitalization, 6.1% had morbidity, 0.9% had readmission, and mortality was 0.6%. ASA PS, ECOG, and CFS were significantly associated with prolonged hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality. MFI was significantly associated with prolonged hospitalization and morbidity. No score could predict readmission. On multivariate analysis, morbidity and readmission were significantly associated with neoadjuvant therapy (=0.001), mortality with emergency surgery (=0.001), and prolonged hospitalization with stage III and IV cancer (=0.001). In adult patients undergoing oncosurgery, ASA PS, ECOG, and CFS are predictors of prolonged hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality. MFI is predictive of prolonged hospitalization and morbidity. None of the studied pre-operative risk scores predict readmission. Newer predictive tools with cancer-specific factors are required for better risk stratification of cancer patients undergoing surgery.
有多种术前风险评估评分可用于接受手术的癌症患者的风险分层。这是第一项比较常用的术前风险评估工具——东部肿瘤协作组体能状态量表(ECOG)和美国麻醉医师协会身体状况量表(ASA PS)与改良虚弱指数(MFI)和临床虚弱量表(CFS)的虚弱评分的研究。这是一项对一家三级癌症中心一年内接受肿瘤手术的成年癌症患者进行的前瞻性观察研究。使用CFS、MFI、ASA PS和ECOG量表进行术前风险分层。所有患者术后随访30天,并记录并发症情况。进行了单因素和多因素分析。P值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。在研究的4107例患者中,12.6%住院时间延长,6.1%发生并发症,0.9%再次入院,死亡率为0.6%。ASA PS、ECOG和CFS与住院时间延长、并发症和死亡率显著相关。MFI与住院时间延长和并发症显著相关。没有评分能够预测再次入院情况。多因素分析显示,并发症和再次入院与新辅助治疗显著相关(P=0.001),死亡率与急诊手术显著相关(P=0.001),住院时间延长与III期和IV期癌症显著相关(P=0.001)。在接受肿瘤手术的成年患者中,ASA PS、ECOG和CFS是住院时间延长、并发症和死亡率的预测因素。MFI可预测住院时间延长和并发症。所研究的术前风险评分均不能预测再次入院情况。需要具有癌症特异性因素的更新的预测工具,以便对接受手术的癌症患者进行更好的风险分层。