van den Bogaard A E, Hazen M J, Van Boven C P
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Mar;23(3):523-30. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.3.523-530.1986.
Gas chromatographic analysis of volatile fatty acids for identification of obligately anaerobic bacteria and for presumptive diagnosis of anaerobic infections is now widely practiced. However, it is difficult to compare data because only a qualitative analysis is done or only chromatograms are presented instead of quantitative data on volatile fatty acid production. We compared three stationary phases for volatile fatty acid analysis of aqueous solutions and four methods of pretreating samples for gas chromatography. Quantitative analysis could be done accurately by using Carbowax as the stationary phase after pretreatment of spent culture media with Dowex columns. If only qualitative analysis is required (e.g., for presumptive diagnosis of anaerobic infections), ether extraction and headspace analysis are equally suitable. The overall variation coefficient for volatile fatty acid production by four reference strains of obligately anaerobic bacteria after 24 h of incubation was approximately 10%.
利用气相色谱分析挥发性脂肪酸以鉴定专性厌氧菌及对厌氧感染进行初步诊断,目前已广泛应用。然而,由于仅进行定性分析或仅呈现色谱图而非挥发性脂肪酸生成的定量数据,因此难以比较数据。我们比较了用于水溶液挥发性脂肪酸分析的三种固定相以及气相色谱样品预处理的四种方法。用过的培养基经Dowex柱预处理后,使用聚乙二醇作为固定相可准确进行定量分析。如果仅需要定性分析(例如用于厌氧感染的初步诊断),乙醚萃取和顶空分析同样适用。四种专性厌氧菌参考菌株培养24小时后挥发性脂肪酸生成的总体变异系数约为10%。