Dhingra Lovedeep S, Sangha Veer, Aminorroaya Arya, Bryde Robyn, Gaballa Andrew, Ali Adel H, Mehra Nandini, Krumholz Harlan M, Sen Sounok, Kramer Christopher M, Martinez Matthew W, Desai Milind Y, Oikonomou Evangelos K, Khera Rohan
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Am J Cardiol. 2025 Feb 15;237:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.11.028. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) can identify hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) on 12-lead ECGs and offers a novel way to monitor treatment response. Although the surgical or percutaneous reduction of the interventricular septum (SRT) represented initial HCM therapies, mavacamten offers an oral alternative. We aimed to assess the use of AI-ECG as a strategy to evaluate biologic responses to SRT and mavacamten. We applied an AI-ECG model for HCM detection to electrocardiography images from patients who underwent SRT across 3 sites: Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS), Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF), and Atlantic Health System (AHS) and to electrocardiography images from patients receiving mavacamten at YNHHS. A total of 70 patients underwent SRT at YNHHS, 100 at CCF, and 145 at AHS. At YNHHS, there was no significant change in the AI-ECG HCM score before versus after SRT (before SRT: median 0.55 [interquartile range 0.24 to 0.77] vs after SRT: 0.59 [0.40 to 0.75]). The AI-ECG HCM scores also did not improve after SRT at CCF (0.61 [0.32 to 0.79] vs 0.69 [0.52 to 0.79]) and AHS (0.52 [0.35 to 0.69] vs 0.61 [0.49 to 0.70]). Of the 36 YNHHS patients on mavacamten therapy, the median AI-ECG score before starting mavacamten was 0.41 (0.22 to 0.77), which decreased significantly to 0.28 (0.11 to 0.50, p <0.001 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test) at the end of a median follow-up period of 237 days. In conclusion, we observed a lack of improvement in AI-based HCM score with SRT, in contrast to a significant decrease with mavacamten. Our approach suggests the potential role of AI-ECG for serial point-of-care monitoring of pathophysiologic improvement after medical therapy in HCM using ECG images.
人工智能增强心电图(AI-ECG)能够在12导联心电图上识别肥厚型心肌病(HCM),并为监测治疗反应提供了一种新方法。尽管手术或经皮室间隔减容术(SRT)是最初的HCM治疗方法,但马伐卡坦提供了一种口服替代方案。我们旨在评估将AI-ECG作为一种评估对SRT和马伐卡坦生物学反应的策略。我们将用于HCM检测的AI-ECG模型应用于来自3个地点(耶鲁纽黑文医疗系统(YNHHS)、克利夫兰诊所基金会(CCF)和大西洋医疗系统(AHS))接受SRT患者的心电图图像,以及YNHHS接受马伐卡坦治疗患者的心电图图像。共有70例患者在YNHHS接受SRT,100例在CCF,145例在AHS。在YNHHS,SRT前后AI-ECG的HCM评分无显著变化(SRT前:中位数0.55[四分位间距0.24至0.77],SRT后:0.59[0.40至0.75])。在CCF(0.61[0.32至0.79]对0.69[0.52至0.79])和AHS(0.52[0.35至0.69]对0.61[0.49至0.70]),SRT后AI-ECG的HCM评分也未改善。在YNHHS接受马伐卡坦治疗的36例患者中,开始使用马伐卡坦前AI-ECG评分的中位数为0.41(0.22至0.77),在中位随访期237天结束时显著降至0.28(0.11至0.50,Wilcoxon符号秩检验p<0.001)。总之,我们观察到SRT后基于AI的HCM评分没有改善,而马伐卡坦治疗后则显著降低。我们的方法表明,AI-ECG在使用心电图图像对HCM药物治疗后病理生理改善进行连续床旁监测方面具有潜在作用。