Morales-Gómez C, Ojeda-Uribe G, Adorno-Farías D, Maturana-Ramirez A, Espinoza-Santander I
Department of Oral Pathology and Medicine Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile Olivos 943. Independencia, Santiago, Chile
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 Jan 1;30(1):e49-e55. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26825.
The objective of this research was to evaluate the performance of specialists in oral medicine doing diagnosis of oral mucosa lesions through digital images comparing general dental practitioner in Chile.
20 oral medicine specialists from the national registry of specialists in Chile and 20 general dental practitioners were invited to participate. Each participant reviewed 33 cases with digital images of oral mucosa lesions and was asked to submit diagnostic hypotheses. The proportions of correct diagnoses and diagnostic accuracy were determined. Analyses were performed using STATA 16.0.
Specialists presented a higher total proportion of correct diagnoses than general dental practioners (86.5% vs 49.2%). Specialists also showed higher sensitivity (88.5% vs 59.3%) and greater specificity (85.8% vs 48.6 %) than general dental practioners in the diagnosis of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders compared to benign oral lesions.
In Chile, oral medicine specialists are a reliable alternative to provide diagnostic guidance through e-consult, but its margin of error must be considered.
本研究的目的是通过数字图像评估智利口腔医学专家与普通牙科医生对口腔黏膜病变的诊断表现。
邀请了智利国家专家登记册中的20名口腔医学专家和20名普通牙科医生参与。每位参与者查看了33例口腔黏膜病变的数字图像,并被要求提交诊断假设。确定正确诊断的比例和诊断准确性。使用STATA 16.0进行分析。
专家的正确诊断总比例高于普通牙科医生(86.5%对49.2%)。与良性口腔病变相比,在口腔癌和口腔潜在恶性疾病的诊断中,专家的敏感性(88.5%对59.3%)和特异性(85.8%对48.6%)也高于普通牙科医生。
在智利,口腔医学专家是通过电子咨询提供诊断指导的可靠选择,但必须考虑其误差范围。