• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降压药物推荐用于降低高血压患者的动脉僵硬度:基于机器学习的多队列(RIGIPREV)研究。

Antihypertensive Drug Recommendations for Reducing Arterial Stiffness in Patients With Hypertension: Machine Learning-Based Multicohort (RIGIPREV) Study.

机构信息

CarVasCare Research Group, Facultad de Enfermería de Cuenca, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.

Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, Chile.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 25;26:e54357. doi: 10.2196/54357.

DOI:10.2196/54357
PMID:39585738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11629035/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High systolic blood pressure is one of the leading global risk factors for mortality, contributing significantly to cardiovascular diseases. Despite advances in treatment, a large proportion of patients with hypertension do not achieve optimal blood pressure control. Arterial stiffness (AS), measured by pulse wave velocity (PWV), is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events and overall mortality. Various antihypertensive drugs exhibit differential effects on PWV, but the extent to which these effects vary depending on individual patient characteristics is not well understood. Given the complexity of selecting the most appropriate antihypertensive medication for reducing PWV, machine learning (ML) techniques offer an opportunity to improve personalized treatment recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop an ML model that provides personalized recommendations for antihypertensive medications aimed at reducing PWV. The model considers individual patient characteristics, such as demographic factors, clinical data, and cardiovascular measurements, to identify the most suitable antihypertensive agent for improving AS.

METHODS

This study, known as the RIGIPREV study, used data from the EVA, LOD-DIABETES, and EVIDENT studies involving individuals with hypertension with baseline and follow-up measurements. Antihypertensive drugs were grouped into classes such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers, diuretics, and combinations of diuretics with ACEIs or ARBs. The primary outcomes were carotid-femoral and brachial-ankle PWV, while the secondary outcomes included various cardiovascular, anthropometric, and biochemical parameters. A multioutput regressor using 6 random forest models was used to predict the impact of each antihypertensive class on PWV reduction. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R) and mean squared error.

RESULTS

The random forest models exhibited strong predictive capabilities, with internal validation yielding R values between 0.61 and 0.74, while external validation showed a range of 0.26 to 0.46. The mean squared values ranged from 0.08 to 0.22 for internal validation and from 0.29 to 0.45 for external validation. Variable importance analysis revealed that glycated hemoglobin and weight were the most critical predictors for ACEIs, while carotid-femoral PWV and total cholesterol were key variables for ARBs. The decision tree model achieved an accuracy of 84.02% in identifying the most suitable antihypertensive drug based on individual patient characteristics. Furthermore, the system's recommendations for ARBs matched 55.3% of patients' original prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the utility of ML techniques in providing personalized treatment recommendations for antihypertensive therapy. By accounting for individual patient characteristics, the model improves the selection of drugs that control blood pressure and reduce AS. These findings could significantly aid clinicians in optimizing hypertension management and reducing cardiovascular risk. However, further studies with larger and more diverse populations are necessary to validate these results and extend the model's applicability.

摘要

背景

收缩压升高是全球导致死亡的主要风险因素之一,对心血管疾病有重大影响。尽管在治疗方面取得了进展,但很大一部分高血压患者并未达到理想的血压控制水平。脉搏波速度(PWV)测量的动脉僵硬度(AS)是心血管事件和总体死亡率的独立预测因素。各种降压药物对 PWV 有不同的影响,但这些影响在多大程度上取决于个体患者的特征尚不清楚。鉴于为降低 PWV 选择最合适的降压药物具有复杂性,机器学习(ML)技术为改善个性化治疗建议提供了机会。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种 ML 模型,为降低 PWV 的降压药物提供个性化建议。该模型考虑了个体患者的特征,如人口统计学因素、临床数据和心血管测量结果,以确定最适合改善 AS 的降压药物。

方法

这项名为 RIGIPREV 的研究使用了来自 EVA、LOD-DIABETES 和 EVIDENT 研究的数据,这些研究涉及有基线和随访测量的高血压患者。降压药物被分为 ACEI、ARB、β受体阻滞剂、利尿剂和利尿剂与 ACEI 或 ARB 的组合等类别。主要结果是颈动脉-股动脉和肱动脉-踝动脉 PWV,次要结果包括各种心血管、人体测量和生化参数。使用 6 个随机森林模型的多输出回归器来预测每种降压类别对 PWV 降低的影响。使用决定系数(R)和均方误差评估模型性能。

结果

随机森林模型表现出很强的预测能力,内部验证的 R 值在 0.61 到 0.74 之间,外部验证的 R 值在 0.26 到 0.46 之间。内部验证的均方值范围为 0.08 到 0.22,外部验证的均方值范围为 0.29 到 0.45。变量重要性分析显示,糖化血红蛋白和体重是 ACEI 的最重要预测因素,而颈动脉-股动脉 PWV 和总胆固醇是 ARB 的关键变量。决策树模型在根据个体患者特征识别最合适的降压药物方面达到了 84.02%的准确率。此外,该系统对 ARB 的建议与 55.3%的患者原始处方相匹配。

结论

本研究证明了机器学习技术在提供降压治疗个性化治疗建议方面的实用性。通过考虑个体患者的特征,该模型提高了控制血压和降低 AS 的药物选择。这些发现可以显著帮助临床医生优化高血压管理并降低心血管风险。然而,需要更大和更多样化的人群研究来验证这些结果并扩展模型的适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca10/11629035/e8618c0a7aa9/jmir_v26i1e54357_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca10/11629035/1625170b827c/jmir_v26i1e54357_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca10/11629035/e8618c0a7aa9/jmir_v26i1e54357_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca10/11629035/1625170b827c/jmir_v26i1e54357_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca10/11629035/e8618c0a7aa9/jmir_v26i1e54357_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Antihypertensive Drug Recommendations for Reducing Arterial Stiffness in Patients With Hypertension: Machine Learning-Based Multicohort (RIGIPREV) Study.降压药物推荐用于降低高血压患者的动脉僵硬度:基于机器学习的多队列(RIGIPREV)研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 25;26:e54357. doi: 10.2196/54357.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 1;2014(2):CD008117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008117.pub2.
4
Cochrane in context: pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.Cochrane背景下:儿童高血压的药物干预
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):581-3. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1975.
5
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974.
6
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension.噻嗪类利尿剂单药治疗原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD003824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Beta-blockers for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub2.
9
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension.血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗原发性高血压的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 22;2014(8):CD009096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009096.pub2.
10
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Elevated pulse wave velocity as a marker of arterial stiffness and its association with mortality in US adults.脉搏波速度升高作为动脉僵硬度的标志物及其与美国成年人死亡率的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07198-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Deep Attention Q-Network for Personalized Treatment Recommendation.用于个性化治疗推荐的深度注意力Q网络
IEEE Int Conf Data Min Workshops. 2023 Dec;2023:329-337. doi: 10.1109/icdmw60847.2023.00048. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Comparative effect of antihypertensive drugs in improving arterial stiffness in adults with hypertension (RIGIPREV study). A network meta-analysis.抗高血压药物对改善成人高血压患者动脉僵硬度的比较效果(RIGIPREV研究)。一项网状荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 1;14:1225795. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1225795. eCollection 2023.
3
Predicting Changes in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure of Hypertensive Patients in Indonesia Using Machine Learning.
使用机器学习预测印度尼西亚高血压患者的收缩压和舒张压变化。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):377-383. doi: 10.1007/s11906-023-01261-5. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
4
Machine learning algorithms identify hypokalaemia risk in people with hypertension in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018.机器学习算法在美国国家健康与营养调查 1999-2018 中识别出高血压人群中的低钾血症风险。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2209336. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2209336.
5
Machine-learning predictive model of pregnancy-induced hypertension in the first trimester.基于机器学习的早孕期子痫前期预测模型。
Hypertens Res. 2023 Sep;46(9):2135-2144. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01298-8. Epub 2023 May 9.
6
Survey and Evaluation of Hypertension Machine Learning Research.高血压机器学习研究的调查与评估。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 May 2;12(9):e027896. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027896. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
7
A comparative study of antihypertensive drugs prediction models for the elderly based on machine learning algorithms.基于机器学习算法的老年高血压药物预测模型的比较研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 1;9:1056263. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1056263. eCollection 2022.
8
Cardiovascular Disease Detection using Ensemble Learning.基于集成学习的心血管疾病检测
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 16;2022:5267498. doi: 10.1155/2022/5267498. eCollection 2022.
9
Machine Learning for Hypertension Prediction: a Systematic Review.机器学习在高血压预测中的应用:系统评价。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2022 Nov;24(11):523-533. doi: 10.1007/s11906-022-01212-6. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
10
Identifying drug-related attributes to personalise antihypertensive agents: the outcome report of patients receiving metoprolol therapy.确定与药物相关的属性以实现个体化降压药物治疗:接受美托洛尔治疗的患者的结局报告。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Dec 30;21(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01739-9.