• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using positionality and reflexivity to support equity in partnership-driven research.利用定位和反思来支持伙伴关系驱动的研究中的公平性。
Conserv Biol. 2024 Dec;38(6):e14396. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14396.
2
Improving transparency in conservation social science research to enhance quality, equity, and collaboration.提高保护社会科学研究的透明度,以提升质量、公平性与协作性。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Apr;39(2):e70003. doi: 10.1111/cobi.70003.
3
Thinking Theoretically in Nursing Research-Positionality and Reflexivity in an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) Study.护理研究中的理论思维——解释现象学分析(IPA)研究中的定位与反身性。
Nurs Inq. 2025 Jan;32(1):e12684. doi: 10.1111/nin.12684.
4
Recognizing reflexivity among conservation practitioners.认识到保护从业者之间的反思性。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Apr;37(2):e14022. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14022. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
5
Conducting mixed methods research with women in a forensic mental health setting: A reflexive account from a nurse as researcher.在法医心理健康环境中对女性进行混合方法研究:护士作为研究者的反思性叙述。
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70038. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70038.
6
Positioning Positionality and Reflecting on Reflexivity: Moving From Performance to Practice.定位、位置性与反思反身性:从表现转向实践
Qual Health Res. 2025 Mar 28:10497323241309230. doi: 10.1177/10497323241309230.
7
`It's not just linguistically, there's much more going on': The experiences and practices of bilingual paediatric speech and language therapists in the UK.“这不仅仅是语言方面的问题,还有更多的问题在起作用”:英国双语儿科言语和语言治疗师的经验和实践。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1715-1733. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13027. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
8
Identity, positionality and reflexivity: relevance and application to research paramedics.身份认同、位置性与反思性:对护理人员研究的相关性及应用
Br Paramed J. 2022 Sep 1;7(2):43-49. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2022.09.7.2.43.
9
Flipping data on its head: Differing conceptualisations of data and the implications for actioning Indigenous data sovereignty principles.
Glob Public Health. 2025 Dec;20(1):2450395. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2025.2450395. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
10
Early-Career Autism Researchers Are Shifting Their Research Directions: Tragedy or Opportunity?早期职业自闭症研究人员正在改变他们的研究方向:悲剧还是机遇?
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Sep 1;5(3):218-224. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0021. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Placing diverse knowledge systems at the core of transformative climate research.将多样化的知识体系置于变革性气候研究的核心。
Ambio. 2023 Sep;52(9):1431-1447. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01857-w. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
2
Extending the CARE Principles from tribal research policies to benefit sharing in genomic research.将《CARE原则》从部落研究政策扩展至基因组研究中的利益分享。
Front Genet. 2022 Nov 11;13:1052620. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1052620. eCollection 2022.
3
Recognizing reflexivity among conservation practitioners.认识到保护从业者之间的反思性。
Conserv Biol. 2023 Apr;37(2):e14022. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14022. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
4
Reflexivity as a tool for medical students to identify and address gender bias in clinical practice: A qualitative study.反思作为医学生在临床实践中识别和解决性别偏见的工具:一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Dec;105(12):3521-3528. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.017. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
5
The need for formal reflexivity in conservation science.保护科学中形式化反思的必要性。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Apr;36(2):e13840. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13840. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
6
Conservation of Earth's biodiversity is embedded in Indigenous fire stewardship.保护地球生物多样性的理念根植于原住民的传统火管理之中。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 10;118(32). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105073118.
7
Culturally Adaptive Governance-Building a New Framework for Equity in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research: Theoretical Basis, Ethics, Attributes and Evaluation.文化适应性治理——为原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民健康研究构建公平新框架:理论基础、伦理、属性和评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 27;18(15):7943. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157943.
8
Research as Cultural Renewal: Applying Two-Eyed Seeing in a Research Project about Cultural Interventions in First Nations Addictions Treatment.作为文化复兴的研究:在一个关于原住民成瘾治疗文化干预的研究项目中应用双眼看理论。
Int Indig Policy J. 2015 May 1;6(2):1-15. doi: 10.18584/iipj.2015.6.2.4.

利用定位和反思来支持伙伴关系驱动的研究中的公平性。

Using positionality and reflexivity to support equity in partnership-driven research.

机构信息

Marine Affairs Program, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Mi'kmaw Conservation Group, The Confederacy of Mainland Mi'kmaq, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2024 Dec;38(6):e14396. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14396.

DOI:10.1111/cobi.14396
PMID:39587030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11588975/
Abstract

Social and economic position and power shape everyone, including scientists and researchers. The way researchers do conservation science and the voices centered in the process are a result of researcher upbringing, experiences, access to resources, and values and are a manifestation of positionality. Positionality is a concept that can help one think about one's position and power in one's work. Creating a successful research partnership requires careful thinking about how equity, diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility are accounted for in the research environment. We drew on our own experiences as early career, mid-career, and Indigenous researchers to explore researcher positionality and how understanding one's positionality can bring to the fore power dynamics in conservation science and research. We focused on the use of reflexive practice to recognize diverse roles and responsibilities, build strong project governance, and enrich relationships. We considered 2 large research partnerships, Apoqnmatulti'k (Mi'kmaw for we help each other) and the SakKijânginnaniattut Nunatsiavut Sivunitsangit (Inuttitut for Sustainable Nunatsiavut Futures) project, to examine moments of tension and interrogation of power and the ways in which this interrogation led to stronger relationships and better research. We advise that large transdisciplinary and cross-cultural research teams use positionality and reflexivity to explicitly make choices about power dynamics in the context of executing partnership-driven work. This can be accomplished through personal and collective interrogation of the power dynamics at play in project administration, research questions, and interpersonal relationships.

摘要

社会和经济地位与权力塑造了每个人,包括科学家和研究人员。研究人员从事保护科学的方式以及该过程中关注的声音,是研究人员成长背景、经验、资源获取、价值观的结果,也是其立场的表现。立场性是一个可以帮助人们思考自己在工作中的位置和权力的概念。创建成功的研究合作伙伴关系需要仔细考虑在研究环境中如何考虑公平性、多样性、包容性和可及性。我们借鉴了自己作为早期职业、中期职业和土著研究人员的经验,探讨了研究人员的立场性,以及了解自己的立场性如何突出保护科学和研究中的权力动态。我们重点关注使用反思性实践来认识到不同的角色和责任、建立强大的项目治理以及丰富关系。我们考虑了两个大型研究合作伙伴关系,Apoqnmatulti'k(米克马克语,意为我们互相帮助)和 SakKijânginnaniattut Nunatsiavut Sivunitsangit(因努特语,意为可持续的努纳武特未来)项目,以考察紧张时刻和对权力的质疑,以及这种质疑如何导致更强的关系和更好的研究。我们建议大型跨学科和跨文化研究团队在执行以伙伴关系为导向的工作时,使用立场性和反思性来明确选择权力动态。这可以通过对项目管理、研究问题和人际关系中发挥作用的权力动态进行个人和集体的质疑来实现。