Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Nov 13;15(5):113-124. doi: 10.36834/cmej.78841. eCollection 2024 Nov.
While the hidden curriculum (HC) is becoming recognized as an important component of medical education, ideal methods of assessing the HC are not well known. The aim of this study was to review the literature for methods of assessing the HC in the context of healthcare education.
We conducted a scoping review on methods to measure or assess the HC in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and ProQuest ERIC databases were searched from inception until August 2023. Studies which focused on healthcare education, including medicine, as well as other professions such as nursing, social work, pharmacy were included. We then obtained stakeholder feedback utilizing the results of this review to inform the ongoing HC assessment process within our own medical education program.
Of 141 studies included for full text review, 41 were included for analysis and data extraction. Most studies were conducted in North America and qualitative in nature. Physician education was best represented with most studies set in undergraduate medical education ( = 21, 51%). Assessment techniques included interviews ( = 19, 46%), cross-sectional surveys ( = 14, 34%), written reflections ( = 7, 17%), and direct observation of the working environment ( = 2, 5%). While attempts to create standardized HC evaluation methods were identified, there were no examples of implementation into an educational program formally or longitudinally. No studies reported on actions taken based on evaluation results. Confidential stakeholder feedback was obtained from postgraduate medical learners in our program, and this feedback was then used to modify our longitudinal HC assessment process.
While the HC has as increasing presence in the medical education community, the ideal way to practically assess it within a healthcare education context remains unclear. We described the HC assessment process utilized at our program, which may be informative for other institutions attempting to implement a similar technique. Future attempts and studies would benefit from reporting longitudinal data and impacts of assessment results.
尽管隐性课程(HC)已逐渐被视为医学教育的重要组成部分,但评估 HC 的理想方法并不为人所知。本研究旨在综述评估医疗保健教育背景下 HC 的文献,以了解评估 HC 的方法。
我们根据 JBI 循证实践手册进行了范围综述,以评估 HC 的方法。检索了 Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE 和 ProQuest ERIC 数据库,检索时间从建库到 2023 年 8 月。纳入了关注医疗保健教育的研究,包括医学,以及护理、社会工作、药学等其他专业。然后,我们利用这项综述的结果获得利益相关者的反馈,以告知我们医学教育项目中正在进行的 HC 评估过程。
在纳入全文审查的 141 项研究中,有 41 项研究被纳入分析和数据提取。大多数研究是在北美进行的,其性质是定性的。以本科医学教育为主(21 项,51%),研究对象为医生教育。评估技术包括访谈(19 项,46%)、横断面调查(14 项,34%)、书面反思(7 项,17%)和工作环境的直接观察(2 项,5%)。虽然已经尝试创建标准化 HC 评估方法,但没有将其正式或纵向纳入教育计划的实例。没有研究报告根据评估结果采取的行动。我们从我们的项目中的研究生医学学习者那里获得了机密的利益相关者反馈,然后利用这些反馈来修改我们的纵向 HC 评估过程。
尽管 HC 在医学教育界的影响力日益增强,但在医疗保健教育背景下实际评估 HC 的理想方法仍不清楚。我们描述了我们项目中使用的 HC 评估过程,这可能对其他试图实施类似技术的机构有参考价值。未来的尝试和研究将受益于报告纵向数据和评估结果的影响。