Laird P, MacKenzie G, Gill F, Burr C, McKinnon E, Cooper M, Geelhoed E, Schultz A
Physiotherapy Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Walyan Respiratory Research Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, University of WA, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Int J Pediatr. 2024 Nov 21;2024:9184954. doi: 10.1155/ijpe/9184954. eCollection 2024.
The aim is to examine whether using a portable spring-infusor device to deliver antibiotics compared with a standard infusion pump (SIP) translated to (i) improve health outcomes, (ii) reduce the length of stay (LoS), and (iii) reduce cost for treatment of exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF). An observational cohort study was conducted between December 2020 and June 2022 with participants aged 8-19 years admitted for exacerbation of CF. An activity monitor was fitted to participants to measure physical activities for the final 5 days of hospital admission. LoS was measured (days). Group allocation was according to participant preference. Costs were compared between the two groups for LoS, pump cost, and preparation and administration of antibiotics. Twenty-seven of 30 eligible participants were approached, and 22 consented. Data were captured for 16 participants (spring-infusor = 9): 10 female; mean (SD) age 14.5 (2.1) years. Average step count was negatively associated with age (rho = 0.50), and greater overall in participants using spring-infusors (mean 5324 (SD 2873) steps) versus SIPs (4806 (3116) steps) - mean (95% CI) increase in the spring-infusor group of 3246 (54-6438) for participants of the same age. LoS was longer on average in the SIP group, (mean (SD) LoS: 16.1 (4.3) versus 12.4 (1.7)). The estimated cost saving for a child using a spring-infusor was AUS$12,000. Results from the study suggest that children hospitalised for exacerbations of CF are more active if they receive antibiotics via a spring-infusor device compared with a SIP, and have reduced hospital stay that results in cost saving to the hospital. Spring-infusors are small, portable, and mechanical devices to deliver intravenous antibiotics to patients. Spring-infusors are preferred by patients with CF at Perth Children's Hospital Physical activity in children with CF is recommended, including during hospital admissions to promote wellbeing, quality of life, and health outcomes. Children hospitalised for exacerbations of CF may be more active if they receive antibiotics via a portable spring-infusor device compared with a SIP. Children using spring-infusors had reduced hospital stays that results in cost saving to the hospital. Children hospitalised for exacerbations of CF step on average, fewer than 5000 steps per day, which is well below recommendations.
目的是研究与标准输液泵(SIP)相比,使用便携式弹簧输液器装置输送抗生素是否能(i)改善健康结果,(ii)缩短住院时间(LoS),以及(iii)降低囊性纤维化(CF)急性加重期的治疗成本。在2020年12月至2022年6月期间进行了一项观察性队列研究,参与者为8至19岁因CF急性加重而入院的患者。在患者住院的最后5天为其佩戴活动监测器以测量身体活动情况。测量住院时间(天数)。分组根据患者偏好进行。比较两组在住院时间、输液泵成本以及抗生素的配制和给药方面的成本。30名符合条件的参与者中有27人被邀请,22人同意参与。收集了16名参与者的数据(弹簧输液器组 = 9):10名女性;平均(标准差)年龄14.5(2.1)岁。平均步数与年龄呈负相关(rho = 0.50),并且使用弹簧输液器的参与者总体步数更多(平均5324(标准差2873)步),而使用标准输液泵的参与者为4806(3116)步——同年龄参与者中弹簧输液器组平均增加3246(54 - 6438)步。标准输液泵组的住院时间平均更长(平均(标准差)住院时间:16.1(4.3)天对12.4(1.7)天)。使用弹簧输液器的儿童估计节省成本12000澳元。研究结果表明,因CF急性加重而住院的儿童,如果通过弹簧输液器装置而非标准输液泵接受抗生素治疗,会更活跃,并且住院时间缩短,从而为医院节省成本。弹簧输液器是用于向患者输送静脉抗生素的小型、便携式机械设备。在珀斯儿童医院,CF患者更喜欢弹簧输液器。建议CF儿童进行身体活动,包括在住院期间,以促进健康、生活质量和健康结果。因CF急性加重而住院的儿童,如果通过便携式弹簧输液器装置而非标准输液泵接受抗生素治疗,可能会更活跃。使用弹簧输液器的儿童住院时间缩短,从而为医院节省成本。因CF急性加重而住院的儿童平均每天步数少于5000步,远低于建议水平。