• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新泽西儿童研究规划中工作组有效性评估:一项关于团队科学的应用混合方法研究

Assessments of working group effectiveness in the planning of the New Jersey Kids Study: An applied mixed-methods study on the science of team science.

作者信息

Gigliotti Ralph A, Weidner Melissa, Jansen Michelle, Greenberg Patricia, Bachmann Gloria, Dominguez-Bello Maria Gloria, Parmar Veenat, Panettieri Reynold A, Reilly Nancy, Ayers Charletta A, Cohen Barrie, Denzin Lisa K, Feldman Cecile A, Fiedler Nancy, Jimenez Manuel E, Laumbach Robert J, Malin Steven K, Mazzaferro Natale, Pai Shilpa, Rosen Todd, Rossman-Murphy Lisa, Salvatore Jessica E, Schmitz Kristine H, Shapses Sue A, Shiau Stephanie, Zarbl Helmut, Reichman Nancy E, Barrett Emily S, Blaser Martin J, Horton Daniel B

机构信息

Office of Organizational Leadership, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 14;8(1):e163. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.578. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.578
PMID:39619065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11604504/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The New Jersey Kids Study (NJKS) is a transdisciplinary statewide initiative to understand influences on child health, development, and disease. We conducted a mixed-methods study of project planning teams to investigate team effectiveness and relationships between team dynamics and quality of deliverables.

METHODS

Ten theme-based working groups (WGs) (e.g., Neurodevelopment, Nutrition) informed protocol development and submitted final reports. WG members ( = 79, 75%) completed questionnaires including de-identified demographic and professional information and a modified TeamSTEPPS Team Assessment Questionnaire (TAQ). Reviewers independently evaluated final reports using a standardized tool. We analyzed questionnaire results and final report assessments using linear regression and performed constant comparative qualitative analysis to identify central themes.

RESULTS

WG-level factors associated with greater team effectiveness included proportion of full professors ( = 31.24, 95% CI 27.65-34.82), team size ( = 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.92), and percent dedicated research effort ( = 0.11, 95% CI 0.09-0.13); age distribution ( = -2.67, 95% CI -3.00 to -2.38) and diversity of school affiliations ( = -33.32, 95% CI -36.84 to -29.80) were inversely associated with team effectiveness. No factors were associated with final report assessments. Perceptions of overall initiative leadership were associated with expressed enthusiasm for future NJKS participation. Qualitative analyses of final reports yielded four themes related to team science practices: organization and process, collaboration, task delegation, and decision-making patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several correlates of team effectiveness in a team science initiative's early planning phase. Extra effort may be needed to bridge differences in team members' backgrounds to enhance the effectiveness of diverse teams. This work also highlights leadership as an important component in future investigator engagement.

摘要

引言

新泽西儿童研究(NJKS)是一项全州范围的跨学科倡议,旨在了解对儿童健康、发育和疾病的影响。我们对项目规划团队进行了一项混合方法研究,以调查团队有效性以及团队动态与可交付成果质量之间的关系。

方法

十个基于主题的工作组(如神经发育、营养)为方案制定提供信息并提交最终报告。工作组成员(n = 79,75%)完成了问卷,包括匿名的人口统计学和专业信息以及一份经过修改的团队STEPPS团队评估问卷(TAQ)。评审人员使用标准化工具独立评估最终报告。我们使用线性回归分析问卷结果和最终报告评估,并进行持续比较定性分析以确定核心主题。

结果

与更高团队有效性相关的工作组层面因素包括正教授比例(β = 31.24,95%置信区间27.65 - 34.82)、团队规模(β = 0.81,95%置信区间0.70 - 0.92)和专门研究工作的百分比(β = 0.11,95%置信区间0.09 - 0.13);年龄分布(β = -2.67,95%置信区间 -3.00至 -2.38)和学校附属机构的多样性(β = -33.32,95%置信区间 -36.84至 -29.80)与团队有效性呈负相关。没有因素与最终报告评估相关。对整体倡议领导力的看法与对未来参与NJKS的热情表达相关。对最终报告的定性分析产生了与团队科学实践相关的四个主题:组织与流程、协作、任务分配和决策模式。

结论

我们在团队科学倡议的早期规划阶段确定了几个与团队有效性相关的因素。可能需要付出额外努力来弥合团队成员背景差异,以提高多元化团队的有效性。这项工作还强调领导力是未来研究人员参与的重要组成部分。

相似文献

1
Assessments of working group effectiveness in the planning of the New Jersey Kids Study: An applied mixed-methods study on the science of team science.新泽西儿童研究规划中工作组有效性评估:一项关于团队科学的应用混合方法研究
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 14;8(1):e163. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.578. eCollection 2024.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
5
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Collaborative team dynamics and scholarly outcomes of multidisciplinary research teams: A mixed-methods approach.多学科研究团队的协作团队动态与学术成果:一种混合方法研究
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 3;7(1):e59. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.9. eCollection 2023.
2
Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes.多学科科学团队的协作可以产生重大成果。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 29;17(11):e0278043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278043. eCollection 2022.
3
Cancer and COVID-19 research studies with team science: a bibliometric study.癌症和 COVID-19 研究中的团队科学:文献计量研究。
J Interprof Care. 2023 Jul-Aug;37(4):568-575. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2022.2115986. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
4
From COVID-19 research to vaccine application: why might it take 17 months not 17 years and what are the wider lessons?从 COVID-19 研究到疫苗应用:为什么需要 17 个月而不是 17 年,以及有哪些更广泛的教训?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 8;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00571-3.
5
Measuring quality and outcomes of research collaborations: An integrative review.衡量研究合作的质量与成果:一项综合综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Oct 11;3(5):261-289. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.402. eCollection 2019 Oct.
6
Team climate mediates the effect of diversity on environmental science team satisfaction and data sharing.团队氛围调节多样性对环境科学团队满意度和数据共享的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219196. eCollection 2019.
7
Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology.大团队推动科学技术发展,小团队则颠覆之。
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7744):378-382. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
8
Teamwork assessment in internal medicine: a systematic review of validity evidence and outcomes.内科中的团队合作评估:有效性证据与结果的系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):894-910. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2686-8. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.实现混合方法设计的整合——原则与实践。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
10
Assessing and evaluating multidisciplinary translational teams: a mixed methods approach.评估多学科转化团队:一种混合方法研究路径
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):33-49. doi: 10.1177/0163278713504433. Epub 2013 Sep 23.