Wooten Kevin C, Rose Robert M, Ostir Glenn V, Calhoun William J, Ameredes Bill T, Brasier Allan R
University of Houston Clear Lake, Houston, TX, USA.
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):33-49. doi: 10.1177/0163278713504433. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
A case report illustrates how multidisciplinary translational teams can be assessed using outcome, process, and developmental types of evaluation using a mixed-methods approach. Types of evaluation appropriate for teams are considered in relation to relevant research questions and assessment methods. Logic models are applied to scientific projects and team development to inform choices between methods within a mixed-methods design. Use of an expert panel is reviewed, culminating in consensus ratings of 11 multidisciplinary teams and a final evaluation within a team-type taxonomy. Based on team maturation and scientific progress, teams were designated as (a) early in development, (b) traditional, (c) process focused, or (d) exemplary. Lessons learned from data reduction, use of mixed methods, and use of expert panels are explored.
一份病例报告说明了如何使用混合方法，通过结果、过程和发展类型的评估来评估多学科转化团队。结合相关研究问题和评估方法，考虑适用于团队的评估类型。逻辑模型应用于科学项目和团队发展，以指导混合方法设计中方法之间的选择。回顾了专家小组的使用情况，最终对11个多学科团队进行了共识评级，并在团队类型分类中进行了最终评估。根据团队成熟度和科学进展，团队被指定为：(a) 处于发展初期；(b) 传统型；(c) 注重过程型；或 (d) 模范型。探讨了从数据简化、混合方法的使用以及专家小组的使用中吸取的经验教训。
