Kiene Susan M, Miller Amanda P, Tuhebwe Doreen, Ceballos Diego A, Sanchez Cynthia N, Moody Jamie, Famania Lynnette, Moore Richard Vernon, Oren Eyal, McDaniels-Davidson Corinne
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Dec 2;5(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00669-7.
Health disparities lead to negative COVID-19 outcomes for Hispanic/Latino communities. Rapid antigen testing was an important mitigation tool for protecting schools and their communities as in-person learning resumed. Within the context of a 3-middle-school non-inferiority trial we assessed acceptability and appropriateness of at-home and school-based COVID-19 antigen testing and implementation barriers and facilitators to facilitate district-wide scale up.
Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and acceptability and appropriateness implementation outcomes, we collected post-implementation qualitative (n = 30) and quantitative (n = 454) data in English and Spanish from trial participants, in-depth feedback sessions among program implementers (n = 19) and coded 137 project meeting minutes. Verbatim transcripts were thematically analyzed. We used multivariate linear models to evaluate program acceptability and appropriateness by COVID-19 testing modality and mixed qualitative and quantitative findings for interpretation.
Questionnaire respondents closely matched school demographics (> 80% Hispanic/Latino and 8% Filipino/Asian Pacific Islander). While both testing modalities were rated as highly acceptable and appropriate, at-home testing was consistently favorable. Qualitative findings provided actionable areas for at-home testing program refinement, guiding district-wide scale up including: maintaining a learning climate to accommodate modifications as guidelines changed, needs of the school community, and implementation challenges; ensuring an engaged school leadership and sufficient human resources; improving educational communication about COVID-19 and technology ease of use; and increased time for pre-implementation planning and engagement.
Results underscore the value of the CFIR to inform program implementation, particularly programs to reduce disparities during a public health emergency. Results support optimal testing implementation strategies centering the needs and perspectives of Hispanic/Latinos.
健康差异导致西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区出现负面的新冠疫情结果。随着面对面学习的恢复,快速抗原检测是保护学校及其社区的一项重要缓解措施。在一项针对三所中学的非劣效性试验背景下,我们评估了家庭和学校新冠病毒抗原检测的可接受性和适宜性,以及实施障碍和促进因素,以推动在全学区范围内扩大检测规模。
以实施研究综合框架(CFIR)以及可接受性和适宜性实施结果为指导,我们用英语和西班牙语从试验参与者那里收集了实施后的定性数据(n = 30)和定量数据(n = 454),在项目实施者中进行了深入反馈会议(n = 19),并对137份项目会议记录进行了编码。对逐字记录进行了主题分析。我们使用多元线性模型来评估按新冠病毒检测方式划分的项目可接受性和适宜性,并综合定性和定量研究结果进行解读。
问卷调查的受访者与学校人口统计数据高度匹配(超过80%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,8%为菲律宾裔/亚太岛民)。虽然两种检测方式都被评为高度可接受和适宜,但家庭检测一直更受青睐。定性研究结果为家庭检测项目的改进提供了可操作的领域,指导在全学区范围内扩大检测规模,包括:维持学习氛围以适应随着指导方针变化而进行的调整、学校社区的需求以及实施挑战;确保学校领导积极参与并拥有足够的人力资源;改善关于新冠病毒的教育宣传以及技术易用性;增加实施前规划和参与的时间。
结果强调了CFIR对指导项目实施的价值,特别是在公共卫生紧急情况下减少差异的项目。结果支持以西班牙裔/拉丁裔的需求和观点为中心的最佳检测实施策略。