Holbrook Amanda, Park Bohyun, Rast Philippe, Light Gregory A, Clayson Peter E
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Department of Psychology, University of California Davis, Davis, California.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024 Sep 21;5(1):100396. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100396. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Neurophysiological tools have yielded valuable insights into the pathophysiology and treatment of psychosis. However, studies using event-related potentials (ERPs) have primarily focused on mean scores and neglected the within-person variability of ERP scores. The neglect of within-person variability of ERPs in the search for biomarkers might have resulted in crucial differences related to psychosis being missed. In this registered report, we aimed to determine whether distinct patterns of intraindividual variability in ERP biomarkers would be observed in people with a lifetime psychosis diagnosis.
Publicly available data posted to the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive for 1R01MH110434-01 was obtained for 162 patients with a lifetime history of psychosis and 178 never-psychotic (NP) participants. Participants completed tasks that measured the auditory mismatch negativity (MMN), P300, error-related negativity, and reward positivity. Multilevel location-scale models were used to determine whether patients showed greater intraindividual variability of ERP scores than NP participants.
Contrary to predictions, the groups did not differ in within-person variability of MMN frequency, P300, or error-related negativity; patients showed less variability in MMN duration than NP participants. Exploratory analyses of a subset of patients with schizophrenia showed greater variability of MMN in this group than in the NP group. Greater severity of thought disorder and activation symptoms were associated with higher intraindividual MMN variability.
Distinct patterns of intraindividual variability in the measured ERPs were not observed for the broad group of people with lifetime psychotic disorders. Exploratory analyses suggest that intraindividual differences in ERPs are more relevant to schizophrenia and certain symptom dimensions than to psychotic disorders broadly, but research is needed to confirm these exploratory findings.
神经生理学工具为精神病的病理生理学和治疗提供了有价值的见解。然而,使用事件相关电位(ERP)的研究主要集中在平均分数上,而忽略了ERP分数的个体内变异性。在寻找生物标志物时忽略ERP的个体内变异性可能导致与精神病相关的关键差异被遗漏。在本预注册报告中,我们旨在确定在有终生精神病诊断的人群中是否会观察到ERP生物标志物个体内变异性的不同模式。
从美国国立精神卫生研究所数据存档中获取了公开可用的数据,这些数据来自1R01MH110434-01研究,包括162名有终生精神病病史的患者和178名从未患过精神病(NP)的参与者。参与者完成了测量听觉失匹配负波(MMN)、P300、错误相关负波和奖励正波的任务。使用多水平位置-尺度模型来确定患者的ERP分数个体内变异性是否比NP参与者更大。
与预测相反,两组在MMN频率、P300或错误相关负波的个体内变异性方面没有差异;患者的MMN持续时间变异性低于NP参与者。对一组精神分裂症患者的探索性分析表明,该组的MMN变异性高于NP组。思维障碍和激活症状的严重程度越高,个体内MMN变异性越高。
在患有终生精神疾病的广泛人群中,未观察到所测量的ERP个体内变异性的不同模式。探索性分析表明,ERP的个体内差异与精神分裂症和某些症状维度的相关性比与广义的精神疾病更密切,但需要进一步研究来证实这些探索性发现。