Correlation of Edema/Tumor Index With Histopathological Outcomes According to the WHO Classification of Cranial Tumors.

BACKGROUND

Metastatic brain tumors are a prevalent challenge in neurosurgery, with vasogenic edema being a significant consequence of these lesions. Despite the critical role of peritumoral edema in prognosis and patient outcomes, few studies have quantified its diagnostic and prognostic implications. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between the edema/tumor index (ETI) and histopathological outcomes according to the 2021 WHO classification of cranial tumors.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a retrospective analysis of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)-format magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from May 2023 to May 2024, applying manual 3D volumetric segmentation using Image Tool Kit-SNAP (ITK-SNAP, version 3.8.0, University of Pennsylvania) software. The ETI was calculated by dividing the volume of peritumoral edema by the tumor volume. The study included 60 patients, and statistical analyses were performed to assess the correlation between ETI and tumor histopathology, including Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for cutoff points.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were included in the study, with 27 males (45%) and 33 females (55%). The average tumor volume measured by 3D segmentation was 46.9 cubic centimeters (cc) (standard deviation [SD] ± 25.6), and the average peritumoral edema volume was 79 cc (SD ± 37.5) for malignant tumors. The ETI was calculated for each case. Malignant tumors (WHO grades 3 and 4) had a mean ETI of 1.6 (SD ± 1.2), while non-malignant tumors (WHO grades 1 and 2) had a mean ETI of 1.2 (SD ± 1.1), but this difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.51). ROC curve analysis for the ETI did not provide a reliable cutoff point for predicting tumor malignancy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.59, = 0.20). Despite the larger edema volume observed in malignant tumors, the ETI did not correlate significantly with the histopathological grade.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no significant correlation between the ETI and the histopathological grade of brain tumors according to the 2021 WHO classification. While malignant tumors were associated with larger volumes of both tumor and peritumoral edema, the ETI did not prove to be a reliable predictor of tumor malignancy. Therefore, the ETI should not be used as a standalone metric for determining tumor aggressiveness or guiding clinical decision-making. Further studies with larger cohorts are required to better understand the potential prognostic value of the ETI in brain tumors.