• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“停下、暂停并休息一下”:一项关于围产期女性数字情绪健康训练长期效果的混合方法研究

"Stop, pause and take a break": a mixed methods study of the longer-term outcomes of digital emotional wellbeing training for perinatal women.

作者信息

Davis Jacqueline A, Ohan Jeneva L, Bear Natasha, Gibson Lisa, Silva Desiree, Prescott Susan, Finlay-Jones Amy

机构信息

The Kids Research Institute Australia (Formerly Telethon Kids Institute), Perth, Australia.

The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07002-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-07002-z
PMID:39639213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11619203/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maternal psychological distress is related to poorer physical and mental health as well as child developmental problems. Interventions that optimise maternal mental health and wellbeing during the "first 1,000 days" of life should have wide-reaching benefits for the mother and her child. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) during this critical period have the potential to equip women with enhanced coping strategies that can be applied and maintained in daily life. This study aimed to understand uptake of DMHIs in pregnancy, and the extent participants apply intervention strategies 10-12 months post-participation in a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing different digital programs.

METHODS

A mixed methods triangulation approach was undertaken. We explored demographic data and psychological distress measures in the intervention groups and a comparison group that were offered the intervention but did not participate or did not meet the inclusion criteria based on gestational age (n = 525). Intervention participants (n = 54) were invited to undertake an interview up to 12 months post-intervention to understand ongoing skills application. Fifteen interviews were undertaken using a phenomenological approach to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Baseline psychological distress results showed a significant difference between those who enrolled in the intervention, compared to those who did not, with higher psychological distress (combined), and stress and depression (sub-scale) scores for the intervention groups. Qualitative content analysis identified four main themes relating to long-term engagement: (1) Motivations to use skills; (2) Taking time for oneself; (3) Emotional support; and (4) Improving wellbeing (such as aids sleep and emotional impacts). Within each theme there were several sub-themes, including enablers or barriers to engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that women who chose to enrol in DMHIs in pregnancy have greater psychological distress than those who chose not to participate. Many participants in this study continued to apply learnt skills in everyday life, such as breathing exercises. This implies that digital strategies may be effective and applicable longer-term to enable women to apply positive coping skills during critical child developmental periods. Ultimately, this will contribute to designing apps that sustain wellbeing and could be protective in preventing postnatal psychological distress.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number ( ACTRN12620000672954p ); (12/06/2020).

摘要

背景

孕产妇心理困扰与较差的身心健康以及儿童发育问题有关。在生命的“最初1000天”优化孕产妇心理健康和幸福感的干预措施,应对母亲及其孩子产生广泛的益处。在此关键时期的数字心理健康干预措施(DMHI)有潜力让女性掌握能在日常生活中应用和维持的增强应对策略。本研究旨在了解孕期对DMHI的接受情况,以及在一项比较不同数字项目的试点随机对照试验(RCT)中,参与者在参与后10 - 12个月应用干预策略的程度。

方法

采用混合方法三角测量法。我们探究了干预组以及一个对照组(该组虽被提供干预,但未参与或因孕周未符合纳入标准,n = 525)的人口统计学数据和心理困扰测量指标。干预参与者(n = 54)被邀请在干预后长达12个月时接受访谈,以了解所学到的技能的持续应用情况。采用现象学方法进行了15次访谈以分析数据。

结果

基线心理困扰结果显示,参与干预者与未参与者之间存在显著差异,干预组的心理困扰(综合)、压力和抑郁(子量表)得分更高。定性内容分析确定了与长期参与相关的四个主要主题:(1)使用技能的动机;(2)为自己留出时间;(3)情感支持;(4)改善幸福感(如有助于睡眠和情感影响)。每个主题下都有几个子主题,包括参与的促进因素或障碍。

结论

本研究表明,选择在孕期参与DMHI的女性比未参与者有更大的心理困扰。本研究中的许多参与者继续在日常生活中应用所学技能,如呼吸练习。这意味着数字策略可能长期有效且适用,使女性能够在关键的儿童发育时期应用积极的应对技能。最终,这将有助于设计能维持幸福感且可能预防产后心理困扰的应用程序。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册编号(ACTRN12620000672954p);(2020年6月12日)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a37e/11619203/7b382d8f7ffd/12884_2024_7002_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a37e/11619203/7609ad084340/12884_2024_7002_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a37e/11619203/7b382d8f7ffd/12884_2024_7002_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a37e/11619203/7609ad084340/12884_2024_7002_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a37e/11619203/7b382d8f7ffd/12884_2024_7002_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
"Stop, pause and take a break": a mixed methods study of the longer-term outcomes of digital emotional wellbeing training for perinatal women.“停下、暂停并休息一下”:一项关于围产期女性数字情绪健康训练长期效果的混合方法研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07002-z.
2
Perinatal Women's Perspectives of, and Engagement in, Digital Emotional Well-Being Training: Mixed Methods Study.围产期妇女对数字情绪健康培训的看法和参与情况:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 17;25:e46852. doi: 10.2196/46852.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Understanding Engagement in Digital Mental Health and Well-being Programs for Women in the Perinatal Period: Systematic Review Without Meta-analysis.理解围产期女性参与数字心理健康和幸福计划:系统评价而不进行荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 9;24(8):e36620. doi: 10.2196/36620.
5
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of parenting intervention for mothers experiencing psychosocial stress: insights from the early closure of the Mellow Babies RCT.针对经历心理社会压力的母亲的育儿干预措施的临床效果及成本效益:来自“温柔宝贝”随机对照试验提前结束的启示
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Dec;12(17):1-115. doi: 10.3310/KCVL7125.
6
An exploration of psychological and socio-cultural facets in perinatal distress of Pakistani couples: a triangulated qualitative study.巴基斯坦夫妇围产期困境中心理和社会文化层面的探索:三角定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06780-w.
7
Interventions from pregnancy to two years after birth for parents experiencing complex post-traumatic stress disorder and/or with childhood experience of maltreatment.针对经历复杂创伤后应激障碍和/或儿童期受虐待经历的父母,从怀孕到出生后两年的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD014874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014874.pub2.
8
Skill Enactment Among University Students Using a Brief Video-Based Mental Health Intervention: Mixed Methods Study Within a Randomized Controlled Trial.大学生使用基于简短视频的心理健康干预措施的技能实施情况:一项随机对照试验中的混合方法研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Aug 21;11:e53794. doi: 10.2196/53794.
9
A Self-Help Online Intervention Is Associated with Reduced Distress and Improved Mental Wellbeing in Australian Farmers: The Evaluation and Key Mechanisms of www.ifarmwell.com.au.一个自助式在线干预措施与澳大利亚农民的压力减轻和精神健康改善相关:www.ifarmwell.com.au 的评估和关键机制。
J Agromedicine. 2023 Jul;28(3):378-392. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2022.2156642. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
10
Study protocol of guided mobile-based perinatal mindfulness intervention (GMBPMI) - a randomized controlled trial.基于引导的移动围产期正念干预(GMBPMI)研究方案——一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0270683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270683. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Perinatal Women's Perspectives of, and Engagement in, Digital Emotional Well-Being Training: Mixed Methods Study.围产期妇女对数字情绪健康培训的看法和参与情况:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 17;25:e46852. doi: 10.2196/46852.
2
Time-out for well-being: A mixed methods evaluation of attitudes and likelihood to engage in different types of online emotional well-being programmes in the perinatal period.为了身心健康暂停一会:一项混合方法评估,评估在围产期对不同类型的在线情绪健康计划的态度和参与可能性。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231184507. doi: 10.1177/17455057231184507.
3
Understanding Engagement in Digital Mental Health and Well-being Programs for Women in the Perinatal Period: Systematic Review Without Meta-analysis.
理解围产期女性参与数字心理健康和幸福计划:系统评价而不进行荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 9;24(8):e36620. doi: 10.2196/36620.
4
Perinatal mental health literacy: knowledge, attitudes, and help-seeking among perinatal women and the public - a systematic review.围产期心理健康素养:围产期妇女和公众的知识、态度和寻求帮助 - 系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04865-y.
5
Experiencing loneliness in parenthood: a scoping review.为人父母时的孤独体验:范围综述。
Perspect Public Health. 2021 Jul;141(4):214-225. doi: 10.1177/17579139211018243.
6
Can Positive Mindsets Be Protective Against Stress and Isolation Experienced during the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Emotional Health and Wellbeing Needs of Perinatal Women.积极心态能否在 COVID-19 大流行期间起到保护作用,减轻压力和孤独感?一种混合方法,旨在了解围产期女性的情绪健康和幸福感需求。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;18(13):6958. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136958.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing.系统评价和心理干预对改善心理健康的荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 May;5(5):631-652. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01093-w. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
Genes, Environments, and Time: The Biology of Adversity and Resilience.基因、环境与时间:逆境与复原力的生物学原理
Pediatrics. 2021 Feb;147(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1651.
9
Psychosocial factors associated with postpartum psychological distress during the Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间与产后心理困扰相关的心理社会因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Nov 18;20(1):703. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03399-5.
10
Comparing Web-Based Mindfulness With Loving-Kindness and Compassion Training for Promoting Well-Being in Pregnancy: Protocol for a Three-Arm Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.比较基于网络的正念与慈爱和慈悲训练对促进孕期幸福感的影响:一项三臂试点随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Oct 14;9(10):e19803. doi: 10.2196/19803.