Suppr超能文献

一种用于确定科学观点和共识程度的新方法的开发。

Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement.

作者信息

Vickers Peter, Adamo Ludovica, Alfano Mark, Clark Cory, Cresto Eleonora, Cui He, Dang Haixin, Dellsén Finnur, Dupin Nathalie, Gradowski Laura, Graf Simon, Guevara Aline, Hallap Mark, Hamilton Jesse, Hardey Mariann, Helm Paula, Landrum Asheley, Levy Neil, Machery Edouard, Mills Sarah, Muller Seán, Sheppard Joanne, N K Shinod, Slater Matthew, Stegenga Jacob, Strandin Henning, Stuart Michael T, Sweet David, Tasdan Ufuk, Taylor Henry, Towler Owen, Tulodziecki Dana, Tworek Heidi, Wallbank Rebecca, Wiltsche Harald, Mitchell Finnigan Samantha

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.

School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 6;19(12):e0313541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313541. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world's scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a '10 second survey', where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.

摘要

我们接受了一项挑战,即建立一个能够持续对全球科学家进行调查的国际网络,提供有关科学家和科学子群体观点的丰富数据集,包括某个时间点以及随时间变化的数据。所采用的新颖方法是,网络中的每个机构的本地协调员在其所在机构内部向科学家发送调查邀请电子邮件。这些电子邮件链接到一个“10秒调查”,参与者会看到一条要考虑的单一陈述以及标准的五点李克特量表。2023年6月,一组30名哲学家和社会科学家邀请了12个国家30个机构的20,085名科学家参与,收集到了6,807份对“科学已经毫无疑问地证明COVID-19是由一种病毒引起的”这一陈述的回复。该研究表明,有可能建立一个全球网络,以高回复率、低退出率且允许显著(或许是无限期)重复性的方式,在大规模国际范围内快速确定科学观点。以这种新方式衡量科学观点将是对现有方法的宝贵补充,可能为不同领域的政策决策和公众理解提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd1/11623554/c2d10001487d/pone.0313541.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验