Hülsdünker Thorben, Koster Joe, Mierau Andreas
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, LUNEX, Differdange, Luxembourg.
Luxembourg Health & Sport Sciences Research Institute (LHSSRI), Differdange, Luxembourg.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 Jan;25(1):e12231. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12231. Epub 2024 Dec 8.
Active breaks are suggested to support recovery and performance in sports. Previous research in ball and team sports focused on motor performance such as repetitive sprinting or change of direction. This does not account for the interaction between motor and cognitive task demands in sports. Therefore, this study is the first to investigate the effectiveness of an active motor-cognitive break to support reactive agility performance. Twenty (7 female and 13 male) healthy trained young adults (mean age: 26 years) performed an active or passive 5 min break following a fatiguing protocol of six 100 m reactive agility runs with an intermittent break of 40 s. Prior to the experiment (pre), after fatigue (post), and following the rest condition (retention), a reactive agility test was performed using the SKILLCOURT technology. In addition, lactate, heartrate, and physical exertion were recorded. Active rest contained two motor-cognitive training tasks on the SKILLCOURT combining low to moderate physical intensity with conflict inhibition and decision-making. During passive rest, participants remained seated. When comparing post and retention agility tests, results indicate significantly stronger performance gains following the active when compared to the passive break condition (p = 0.02 and η = 0.24). This was not associated with any differences in physiological parameters such as lactate, heart rate, or RPE (p ≥ 0.25). The results suggest that active motor-cognitive breaks support recovery and improve sport-related reactive agility performance. Performance gains in the active break are likely attributable to cognitive performance effects rather than physiological recovery, which may benefit athletes especially in ball and team sports.
建议进行主动休息以促进运动后的恢复并提升运动表现。以往关于球类和团队运动的研究主要集中在重复性冲刺或方向改变等运动表现方面。这并未考虑到运动中运动任务与认知任务需求之间的相互作用。因此,本研究首次探讨主动的运动 - 认知休息对支持反应敏捷性表现的有效性。二十名(7名女性和13名男性)健康且经过训练的年轻成年人(平均年龄:26岁)在进行了六次100米反应敏捷性跑并伴有40秒间歇休息的疲劳方案后,进行了5分钟的主动或被动休息。在实验前(pre)、疲劳后(post)以及休息状态后(retention),使用SKILLCOURT技术进行反应敏捷性测试。此外,还记录了乳酸、心率和身体疲劳程度。主动休息包含在SKILLCOURT上的两项运动 - 认知训练任务,将低到中等强度的身体活动与冲突抑制和决策相结合。在被动休息期间,参与者保持坐姿。比较post和retention敏捷性测试结果表明,与被动休息条件相比,主动休息后表现提升更为显著(p = 0.02,η = 0.24)。这与乳酸、心率或主观用力程度等生理参数的任何差异均无关(p≥0.25)。结果表明,主动的运动 - 认知休息有助于恢复并改善与运动相关的反应敏捷性表现。主动休息时的表现提升可能归因于认知表现效应而非生理恢复,这可能对运动员尤其是球类和团队运动的运动员有益。