Vilela Jose Carlos Souza, Barbosa Tadeu Fonseca, Araujo Daniel Oliveira, Gomes Yuri Vinicius Teles, Machado Thalles Leandro Abreu
Cirurgia do Ombro e Cotovelo, Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Unimed Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Cirurgia do Ombro e Cotovelo, Hospital Madre Teresa, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Dec 7;59(5):e765-e770. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1790216. eCollection 2024 Oct.
To evaluate the validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). We assessed 51 patients aged 18 to 40 years who were divided into 3 groups: 17 patients with shoulder instability undergoing conservative treatment, 17 with shoulder instability treated surgically, and 17 without shoulder instability. The patients underwent functional and health assessments using the following scores: WOSI, Rowe, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Scale. The variables sex and age were homogeneous among the groups ( > 0.05). A comparative analysis of the scores revealed that patients undergoing treatment (either surgical or conservative) showed significant differences compared with the control group ( < 0.05). The determination of score correlation was made using the Spearman correlation coefficient. All instruments analyzed showed a significant relationship among themselves but at different levels: the correlation between the WOSI and DASH instruments was perfectly positive ( = 0.96); the comparison of the WOSI and UCLA ( = 0.87), DASH and UCLA ( = 0.86), SSV and Rowe ( = 0.80), VAS and DASH (r = 0.75), VAS and UCLA ( = 0.74), and WOSI and VAS ( = 0.72) also showed a trend towards positive linearity among measurements; and the comparison of the instruments WOSI and SSV, WOSI and Rowe, DASH and Rowe, SSV and UCLA ( = -0.83), SSV and DASH ( = -0.79), Rowe and UCLA ( = -0.78), VAS and SSV ( = -0.68), and VAS and Rowe ( = -0.60) revealed a negative correlation. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the WOSI presents good validity.
评估巴西葡萄牙语版西安大略肩不稳定指数(WOSI)的有效性。我们评估了51名年龄在18至40岁之间的患者,他们被分为3组:17名接受保守治疗的肩不稳定患者,17名接受手术治疗的肩不稳定患者,以及17名无肩不稳定的患者。患者使用以下评分进行功能和健康评估:WOSI、Rowe评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、主观肩部评分(SSV)、上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分以及加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩部评分。各组间的性别和年龄变量具有同质性(P>0.05)。评分的比较分析显示,接受治疗(手术或保守治疗)的患者与对照组相比存在显著差异(P<0.05)。使用Spearman相关系数确定评分相关性。所有分析的工具之间均显示出显著关系,但程度不同:WOSI和DASH工具之间的相关性为完全正相关(r = 0.96);WOSI与UCLA(r = 0.87)、DASH与UCLA(r = 0.86)、SSV与Rowe(r = 0.80)、VAS与DASH(r = 0.75)、VAS与UCLA(r = 0.74)以及WOSI与VAS(r = 0.72)的比较在测量中也显示出正线性趋势;WOSI与SSV、WOSI与Rowe、DASH与Rowe、SSV与UCLA(r = -0.83)、SSV与DASH(r = -0.79)、Rowe与UCLA(r = -0.78)、VAS与SSV(r = -0.68)以及VAS与Rowe(r = -0.60)的工具比较显示出负相关。巴西葡萄牙语版的WOSI具有良好的有效性。