• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚从业者对非法药物使用预防公益广告意外效果的看法。

Practitioners' perspectives on unintended effects of illicit drug use prevention public service announcements in Australia.

作者信息

Munro Kirsteen, Bogomolova Svetlana, Simmonds Lucy

机构信息

Centre for Social Impact, College of Business, Government and Law, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae185.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daae185
PMID:39657151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11630780/
Abstract

Public service announcements (PSAs) or campaigns aimed at preventing harm can inadvertently risk creating additional harms. It remains unclear whether these unintended effects are considered during campaign development, if risk mitigation strategies are implemented, or how professionals involved perceive these issues. It is in the context of illicit drug use prevention PSAs that our research investigates and explores the perspectives of practitioners-health support professionals and advertising campaign designers and creators. Semi-structured expert interviews were conducted to capture and synthesize practitioners' perspectives which were then analysed by applying a framework to address the unintended effects of public health interventions. The results indicated that practitioners from both sectors are aware of unintended harms but place varying levels of importance on different aspects. In the case of illicit drug prevention PSAs, incorporating practitioners' perspectives in campaign development may result in mitigating the risk of potential unintended harmful effects.

摘要

旨在预防伤害的公益广告(PSAs)或宣传活动可能会无意中带来额外的伤害风险。目前尚不清楚在活动开展过程中是否考虑了这些意外影响,是否实施了风险缓解策略,或者相关专业人员如何看待这些问题。正是在预防非法药物使用的公益广告背景下,我们的研究调查并探讨了从业者(健康支持专业人员)以及广告宣传活动设计师和创作者的观点。我们进行了半结构化专家访谈,以捕捉和综合从业者的观点,然后通过应用一个框架来分析这些观点,以解决公共卫生干预措施的意外影响。结果表明,两个领域的从业者都意识到了意外危害,但对不同方面的重视程度各不相同。就预防非法药物的公益广告而言,在活动开展过程中纳入从业者的观点可能会降低潜在意外有害影响的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4397/11630780/5f828d1e6e08/daae185_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4397/11630780/5f828d1e6e08/daae185_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4397/11630780/5f828d1e6e08/daae185_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Practitioners' perspectives on unintended effects of illicit drug use prevention public service announcements in Australia.澳大利亚从业者对非法药物使用预防公益广告意外效果的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae185.
2
Perceptions of a drug prevention public service announcement campaign among street-involved youth in Vancouver, Canada: a qualitative study.加拿大温哥华街头青少年对一项毒品预防公益广告活动的认知:一项定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2017 Jan 13;14(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0132-7.
3
Key stakeholders' perspectives of illicit drug use and associated harms in the Northern Territory of Australia.关键利益攸关方对澳大利亚北部地区非法药物使用及其相关危害的看法。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Sep 20;21(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01092-w.
4
The effectiveness of anti-illicit-drug public-service announcements: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗毒品公益广告的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Oct;65(10):834-40. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.125195. Epub 2011 May 10.
5
Social media delivered mental health campaigns and public service announcements: A systematic literature review of public engagement and help-seeking behaviours.社交媒体传递心理健康运动和公益广告:公众参与和寻求帮助行为的系统文献综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Oct;359:117231. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117231. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
6
Journey mapping drug seizures among police, public health and local nonprofit professionals, and community members who use drugs.梳理警方、公共卫生和当地非营利组织专业人员以及吸毒社区成员之间毒品查获情况的历程。
Int J Drug Policy. 2025 May;139:104774. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104774. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
7
Practitioners' perspectives on family-based intervention for illicit drug-using adolescents in Taiwan: a qualitative study.从业者对台湾地区青少年非法药物使用家庭干预的看法:一项定性研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Apr 26;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00460-8.
8
Can Mental Health Anti-stigma Messages Have Untoward Effects on Some People with Depression?: An Exploratory Study.心理健康反污名化信息会对一些抑郁症患者产生不良影响吗?一项探索性研究。
J Health Commun. 2019;24(11):821-828. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1672838. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
9
Suicide Prevention Public Service Announcements (PSAs): Examples from Around the World.预防自杀公益广告:来自世界各地的实例。
Health Commun. 2017 Apr;32(4):493-501. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1140269. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Media campaigns for the prevention of illicit drug use in young people.针对预防青少年非法药物使用的媒体宣传活动。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 5;2013(6):CD009287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009287.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Seeing is Believing: The Impacts of Visual Exemplars on American Young Adults' Reactions to Anti-Prescription Opioid Campaigns.眼见为实:视觉范例对美国青年对反处方阿片类药物运动反应的影响。
J Drug Educ. 2021 Sep;50(3-4):67-83. doi: 10.1177/00472379211072856. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
2
Stigma as understood by key informants: A social ecological approach to gay and bisexual men's use of crystal methamphetamine for sex.关键知情人眼中的污名:男同性恋和双性恋者使用冰毒进行性行为的社会生态学方法
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Aug;94:103229. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103229. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
How to use and assess qualitative research methods.
如何使用和评估定性研究方法。
Neurol Res Pract. 2020 May 27;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z. eCollection 2020.
4
"Just not all ice users do that": investigating perceptions and potential harms of Australia's Ice Destroys Lives campaign in two studies.“并非所有冰毒使用者都这样”:在两项研究中调查澳大利亚“冰毒摧毁生命”运动的认知和潜在危害。
Harm Reduct J. 2017 Jul 14;14(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0175-9.
5
Creating visual differences: Methamphetamine users perceptions of anti-meth campaigns.制造视觉差异:安非他命使用者对反安非他命运动的看法。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Jan;39:52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
6
Science and scepticism: Drug information, young men and counterpublic health.科学与怀疑主义:药物信息、青年男性与反公共健康。
Health (London). 2017 Nov;21(6):595-615. doi: 10.1177/1363459315628042. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
7
Are mass-media campaigns effective in preventing drug use? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.大众媒体宣传活动在预防药物使用方面是否有效?一项Cochrane系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 3;5(9):e007449. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007449.
8
Assembling the dominant accounts of youth drug use in Australian harm reduction drug education.组装澳大利亚减少毒品危害毒品教育中占主导地位的青年吸毒账户。
Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Jul;25(4):663-72. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 May 5.
9
A scoping review of unintended harm associated with public health interventions: towards a typology and an understanding of underlying factors.一项关于公共卫生干预措施相关的非预期伤害的范围综述:朝向一个分类法和对潜在因素的理解。
Int J Public Health. 2014 Feb;59(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s00038-013-0526-6. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
10
Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework.公共卫生干预措施的不良影响:概念框架。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Mar;68(3):288-90. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203118. Epub 2013 Dec 13.