Weiler Selina M, Duer Christian, Krämer Dustin, Jacobsen Thomas
Experimental Psychology Unit, Humanities and Social Sciences, Helmut Schmidt University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 11;19(12):e0313940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313940. eCollection 2024.
Scientific interest in body modifications continues to grow, and tattoos have recently become a subject of empirical aesthetics. While conceptual structures of tattoo aesthetics have been studied, the question of how tattoos are aesthetically appreciated has not yet been studied. In this study, we examined how tattoos influence the aesthetic appreciation of human stimuli and uncovered differences in beauty perceived by individuals older and younger than 50, which we consider indicative of different internalized social norms, experts (tattoo artists) and nonexperts, and tattooed and nontattooed individuals. Images of a male and a female model were manipulated to vary in the amount of tattoo coverage across six manipulation conditions: Baseline (none), Light, Moderate, Heavy, Extreme, and Extreme + Face. N = 487 participants rated the beauty of these stimuli. The results suggest overall group differences (experts vs. nonexperts; tattooed vs. nontattooed; older vs. younger). The perceived beauty of the stimuli decreased as the extent of tattoos increased, with the Extreme + Face condition standing out as the lowest rated condition. These findings confirm that tattoos influence aesthetic appreciation, which is highly dependent on expertise and social norms as indicated by age. We also discuss the generalizability and implications of the findings.
对身体改造的科学兴趣持续增长,纹身最近已成为实证美学的一个研究对象。虽然纹身美学的概念结构已被研究,但纹身如何在审美上被欣赏的问题尚未得到研究。在本研究中,我们考察了纹身如何影响对人类刺激的审美欣赏,并发现了50岁及以上和50岁以下个体在美感认知上的差异,我们认为这表明了不同的内化社会规范、专家(纹身艺术家)和非专家,以及纹身者和未纹身者之间的差异。对一名男性和一名女性模特的图像进行了处理,使其在六种处理条件下的纹身覆盖量有所不同:基线(无纹身)、轻度、中度、重度、极重度和极重度+面部纹身。487名参与者对这些刺激的美感进行了评分。结果表明存在总体群体差异(专家与非专家;纹身者与未纹身者;年龄较大者与年龄较小者)。随着纹身程度的增加,刺激的感知美感降低,极重度+面部纹身条件下的评分最低。这些发现证实纹身会影响审美欣赏,而审美欣赏高度依赖于专业知识和年龄所表明的社会规范。我们还讨论了研究结果的普遍性和意义。