Gazzellini Simone, Pellegrini Valerio, Napoli Eleonora, Ventre Vanessa, Lettori Donatella, Castelli Enrico, Basile Barbara, Giacomantonio Mauro
Neuroscience Clinic Area, Neurorehabilitation Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1441794. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1441794. eCollection 2024.
According to the theoretical model of Schema Therapy, each human being has basic needs that require natural satisfaction from childhood. When these emotional needs are frustrated, early maladaptive schemas (EMS) develop, leading to coping styles that are strategies to manage the pain caused by activated EMS. The study validates and standardizes the Schema Coping Inventory in the Italian population and evaluates correlations between psychological variables and the SCI.
We analysed data from a community sample of 602 Italian adults, aged between 18 and 69 years, who endorsed a structured questionnaire, involving demographic information, the Italian version of the SCI, and an array of theoretically related psychological constructs.
Confirmative factor analysis corroborated the tridimensional structure of the SCI (Surrender, Avoidance, Overcompensation), both in terms of the overall goodness-of-fit of the model and the single items' factor loading in the corresponding factors. The internal consistency turned out to be satisfactory. Construct validity was assessed through convergent and divergent (positive and negative) correlations with other coping style measures and psychopathological scales. Mean values and mean standard deviations are reported for the general population, for psychopathological clinical and non-pathological samples.
根据图式疗法的理论模型，每个人都有基本需求，这些需求需要从童年起就得到自然满足。当这些情感需求受挫时，早期适应不良图式（EMS）就会形成，从而导致应对方式的出现，这些应对方式是管理由激活的EMS所引起痛苦的策略。本研究在意大利人群中验证并标准化了图式应对量表，并评估心理变量与该量表之间的相关性。
我们分析了来自602名年龄在18至69岁之间的意大利成年人社区样本的数据，这些人认可一份结构化问卷，问卷包括人口统计学信息、意大利语版的图式应对量表以及一系列理论相关的心理结构。
验证性因素分析证实了图式应对量表的三维结构（屈服、回避、过度补偿），无论是从模型的整体拟合优度还是单个项目在相应因素中的因素负荷来看。结果表明内部一致性令人满意。通过与其他应对方式测量方法和心理病理量表的收敛和发散（正相关和负相关）相关性来评估结构效度。报告了一般人群、心理病理临床样本和非病理样本的平均值和平均标准差。
