Butler Catherine R, Gaughran Olivia A, Taylor Janelle S, Gee Patrick O, O'Hare Ann M
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Nephrology Section, Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):186-194. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6653.
Transplant can be a valuable treatment option for older adults with kidney failure, and recent initiatives encourage more frequent referral to transplant centers. However, the evaluation process can be challenging, and most older adults do not ultimately receive a kidney.
To elucidate the perspectives and experiences of older adults with advanced kidney disease and their family members regarding the kidney transplant evaluation process.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study, conducted between December 19, 2022, and February 5, 2024, included adults aged 65 years or older with advanced kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤20 mL/min/1.73 m2, receiving dialysis, or with a functioning kidney transplant) and their family members in Seattle, Washington.
Perspectives and experiences of patients and family members, identified through inductive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews.
A total of 26 older adults (16 [61.5%] men; median age, 68 years [range, 65-74 years]) with advanced kidney disease and 7 of their family members (4 [57.1%] women; median age, 65 years [range, 36-75 years]) were interviewed. Three dominant themes pertaining to the kidney transplant evaluation process were identified: (1) committed to transplant, (2) a complex and protracted process, and (3) responsibility without power. Because receiving a kidney was such an important priority, most participants were willing to engage in what could be a demanding process of testing and treatment narrowly focused on this future goal. However, the transplant evaluation could be lengthy, demanding, opaque, and fragmented, and patients often put other aspects of their lives on hold while awaiting an uncertain result. Patients and families often felt personally responsible for navigating and completing the transplant evaluation despite having little power to shape this process. Feeling responsible for the continued progress of a high-stakes evaluation process while remaining dependent on clinical teams and family members for support could strain relationships.
This qualitative study found that older adults with advanced kidney disease and their family members were highly motivated to receive a kidney transplant but engagement in an evaluation process, over which they had little control, could have far-reaching implications for patients and families. These findings underline the importance of making the transplant evaluation process more transparent and person centered and of helping patients and families who are contemplating or engaged in the process to understand what to expect.
对于老年肾衰竭患者而言,移植可能是一种有价值的治疗选择,并且近期的倡议鼓励更频繁地将患者转诊至移植中心。然而,评估过程可能具有挑战性,并且大多数老年人最终并未获得肾脏移植。
阐明患有晚期肾病的老年人及其家庭成员对于肾脏移植评估过程的观点和经历。
设计、背景和参与者:这项定性研究于2022年12月19日至2024年2月5日进行,纳入了华盛顿州西雅图市年龄在65岁及以上、患有晚期肾病(估计肾小球滤过率≤20 mL/分钟/1.73 m²、正在接受透析或已进行功能性肾脏移植)的成年人及其家庭成员。
通过对半结构化访谈进行归纳主题分析确定患者和家庭成员的观点及经历。
共访谈了26名患有晚期肾病的老年人(16名[61.5%]男性;中位年龄为 68岁[范围为65 - 74岁])及其7名家庭成员(4名[57.1%]女性;中位年龄为65岁[范围为36 - 75岁])。确定了与肾脏移植评估过程相关的三个主要主题:(1)致力于移植,(2)一个复杂且漫长的过程,以及(3)有责无权。由于获得肾脏是如此重要的优先事项,大多数参与者愿意参与这一可能要求苛刻的检测和治疗过程,而这一过程狭义上聚焦于这一未来目标。然而,移植评估可能漫长、要求苛刻、不透明且零散,并且患者在等待不确定结果的同时常常搁置生活的其他方面。患者和家属尽管在塑造这一过程方面几乎没有权力,但往往觉得自己有责任驾驭并完成移植评估。在对一个高风险评估过程的持续推进负责的同时,又要依赖临床团队和家庭成员的支持,这可能会使关系紧张。
这项定性研究发现,患有晚期肾病的老年人及其家庭成员非常有动力接受肾脏移植,但参与一个他们几乎无法控制的评估过程可能会对患者和家庭产生深远影响。这些发现强调了使移植评估过程更加透明和以患者为中心,以及帮助正在考虑或参与该过程的患者和家庭了解预期情况的重要性。