Saleh Somaya Ali, Hassan Nisreen Nabiel, Algarni Amna, Zahran Ranya, Farag Abeer, Hashem Danya
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
BDJ Open. 2024 Dec 17;10(1):94. doi: 10.1038/s41405-024-00283-8.
Evaluating immediate and delayed micro shear bond strength (µSBS) between composite resin and glass ionomer cements using different adhesive systems and mechanical surface treatment.
A total of 240 specimens of glass ionomer restorative materials were divided into two groups: Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC) namely Riva Light Cure and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement (CGIC) namely Riva Self Cure. These were subdivided into immediate (24 h) and delayed (3 months) storage and further divided into smooth, medium, and rough surface treatment with either total etch (TE) or self-etch (SE) adhesive strategies. Composite resin was applied and µSBS of the sample was determined and failure modes were examined.
Immediate µSBS of RMGIC was superior than CGIC and TE was better than SE. Within RMGIC, smooth surface has significantly higher bond strength than medium and rough stone surface treatment. Delayed µSBS of RMGIC was superior than CGIC. Within RMGIC specimens, TE and smooth and medium grit had significantly better bond strength than SE and rough grit. Within CGIC, statistically higher bond strength values were found with medium grit compared to smooth while no difference was found between TE and SE.
Bonding composite resin to smooth RMGIC using TE yielded higher bond strength values than CGIC regardless of the time. Bonding composite resin immediately to CGIC is best done using a TE technique. However, delayed bonding to CGIC requires roughening of the CGIC surface prior to placement of the composite resin to obtain improved bonding.
使用不同的粘结系统和机械表面处理方法,评估复合树脂与玻璃离子水门汀之间的即时和延迟微剪切粘结强度(µSBS)。
总共240个玻璃离子修复材料样本被分为两组:树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC),即丽娃光固化型;以及传统玻璃离子水门汀(CGIC),即丽娃自固化型。这些样本又被细分为即时(24小时)和延迟(3个月)储存组,并进一步根据全酸蚀(TE)或自酸蚀(SE)粘结策略分为光滑、中等和粗糙表面处理组。应用复合树脂并测定样本的µSBS,并检查失败模式。
RMGIC的即时µSBS优于CGIC,且TE优于SE。在RMGIC组内,光滑表面的粘结强度显著高于中等和粗糙石表面处理。RMGIC的延迟µSBS优于CGIC。在RMGIC样本中,TE以及光滑和中等粒度的粘结强度显著优于SE和粗糙粒度。在CGIC组内,中等粒度的粘结强度值在统计学上高于光滑表面,而TE和SE之间没有差异。
无论时间如何,使用TE将复合树脂粘结到光滑的RMGIC上产生的粘结强度值均高于CGIC。立即将复合树脂粘结到CGIC上最好使用TE技术。然而,延迟粘结到CGIC需要在放置复合树脂之前对CGIC表面进行粗糙化处理,以获得更好的粘结效果。