Human and animal brucellosis and risk factors for human infection in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2015-2024).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Brucellosis is a neglected zoonotic disease caused by Brucella species. Unlike most developed nations, the problem of brucellosis in Ethiopia remains a public and animal health concern. This study was conducted to determine the magnitude of brucellosis in animals (mainly cattle, sheep, goats, dogs and camels) and humans, and to identify the risk factors for human brucellosis.

METHODOLOGY

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis, which was performed from May 2024 to July 2024. Academic databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched to identify articles focusing on brucellosis in humans and animals in Ethiopia. Data extraction was performed according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included articles were appraised using the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies to assess study quality. Publication bias and small study effects were examined using funnel plot observation and Egger's test, respectively. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software version 4.4.1.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine articles published between 2015 and 2024 were included in the final analysis from a total of 1,427 identified articles. The overall pooled seroprevalence of brucellosis was 5.0% (95% CI: 3.0, 6.0). The seroprevalence of brucellosis was higher in humans at 6.9% (95% CI: 4.9, 8.8) and lower in cattle at 3.5% (95% CI: 2.2, 4.7). There was high heterogeneity in the reports of brucellosis seroprevalence between studies (τ² = 0.0038, H² = 255.9, I² = 99.61%, Q-test = 1954.99, df = 56, p ≤ 0.001). Laboratory tests and study location were identified as factors contributing to potential sources of variation in the pooled seroprevalence. Drinking raw milk from aborted animals, touching aborted materials or fetuses, and occupation were among the risk factors for human brucellosis. No publication bias or small study effects were detected.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate that brucellosis continues to pose a significant zoonotic threat, particularly to humans, where the seroprevalence is notably higher than in animals. These results highlight the need for targeted public health interventions and greater awareness to reduce the incidence of brucellosis, especially among high-risk populations.