• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上肢疾病工作相关问卷土耳其语版(WORQ-UP)的信度和效度

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Work-Related Questionnaire for Upper Extremity Disorders (WORQ-UP).

作者信息

Koç Meltem, Dal Cansu, Bulut Emin Kürşat, Bayar Banu, Bayar Kılıçhan

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey.

Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey.

出版信息

Med Lav. 2024 Dec 19;115(6):e2024040. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v115i6.15991.

DOI:10.23749/mdl.v115i6.15991
PMID:39697083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11734634/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Work-Related Questionnaire for Upper Extremity Disorders (WORQ-UP) serves as a patient-reported outcome measure to identify work-related limitations in individuals with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. This study aims to adapt the WORQ-UP into Turkish and subsequently evaluate its validity and reliability.

METHODS

The Turkish WORQ-UP, along with the previously validated Turkish Quick DASH, were administered to 136 patients. The Turkish WORQ-UP was applied twice within a 7-14 day interval to assess test-retest reliability. Reliability was assessed using measures of internal consistency and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For validity assessment, Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated between the Turkish WORQ-UP and Quick DASH, and Explanatory (EFA) and Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted.

RESULTS

In the reliability analysis, items 11, 12, 13, 15, and 16, which did not meet the criterion of item total score correlation >30, were excluded, resulting in a 12-item Turkish WORQ-UP with satisfactory validity and reliability outcomes. The Cronbach's alpha and ICC were calculated as 0.895 and 0.879, respectively, while the SEM and MDC were determined to be 0.93 and 1.85. In the EFA, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure (0.895) and Bartlett's tests were both significant (p < 0.001). Additionally, the CFA indicated an acceptable fit with two factors. The goodness of fit indices, including χ2/df = 2.09, CFI = 0.934, TLI = 0.918, and RMSEA = 0.08, confirmed the adequacy of the model. The 12-item Turkish WORQ-UP showed a significant and strong correlation (r = 0.754; p < 0.001) with Quick DASH.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of WORQ-UP with 12 items had proper psychometric properties to identify work-related limitations in individuals with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

摘要

背景

上肢疾病工作相关问卷(WORQ-UP)作为一种患者报告结局指标,用于识别上肢肌肉骨骼疾病患者的工作相关限制。本研究旨在将WORQ-UP改编为土耳其语版本,并随后评估其有效性和可靠性。

方法

将土耳其语版WORQ-UP以及先前验证过的土耳其语版快速DASH问卷应用于136例患者。土耳其语版WORQ-UP在7至14天的间隔内进行了两次测试,以评估重测信度。使用内部一致性测量和组内相关系数(ICC)评估信度。为了进行效度评估,计算了土耳其语版WORQ-UP与快速DASH之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数,并进行了解释性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)。

结果

在信度分析中,排除了项目总分相关性未达到>30标准的第11、12、13、15和16项,从而得到了一个包含12个项目的土耳其语版WORQ-UP,其效度和信度结果令人满意。克朗巴哈系数和ICC分别计算为0.895和0.879,而标准误(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC)分别确定为0.93和1.85。在EFA中,Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin测量值(0.895)和巴特利特检验均具有显著性(p < 0.001)。此外,CFA表明两个因子的拟合度可接受。拟合优度指标,包括χ2/df = 2.09、CFI = 0.934、TLI = 0.918和RMSEA = 0.08,证实了模型的充分性。包含12个项目的土耳其语版WORQ-UP与快速DASH显示出显著且强烈的相关性(r = 0.754;p < 0.001)。

结论

包含12个项目的土耳其语版WORQ-UP具有适当的心理测量学特性,可用于识别上肢肌肉骨骼疾病患者的工作相关限制。

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Work-Related Questionnaire for Upper Extremity Disorders (WORQ-UP).上肢疾病工作相关问卷土耳其语版(WORQ-UP)的信度和效度
Med Lav. 2024 Dec 19;115(6):e2024040. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v115i6.15991.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of WOrk-Related Questionnaire for UPper Extremity Disorders (WORQ-UP).工作相关上肢疾病问卷(WORQ-UP)波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023 Feb;28(1):102-107. doi: 10.1142/S2424835523500030. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
3
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of a Turkish Version of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ-Turkish).工作康复问卷(WORQ-土耳其语版)的土耳其语版本的跨文化调适、信度和效度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Jun;31(2):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09917-8.
4
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia Knowledge Scale (BPSD-T): A Psychometric Evaluation Among Caregivers.痴呆行为和心理症状知识量表土耳其语版(BPSD-T)的效度和信度:护理人员的心理测量学评估
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2024;35(4):295-305. doi: 10.5080/u27614.
5
Examining Work-Related Functioning in a Physical Therapy Outpatient Clinic: Validity and Reliability of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ).在物理治疗门诊中评估与工作相关的功能:工作康复问卷(WORQ)的有效性和可靠性。
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Jun;30(2):156-166. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09857-y.
6
Adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the alarm fatigue assessment questionnaire.土耳其版报警疲劳评估问卷的改编和验证。
Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2024 Apr-Jun;35(2):114-123. doi: 10.1016/j.enfie.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
7
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
8
DASH questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms in industry workers: a validity and reliability study.用于分析产业工人肌肉骨骼症状的DASH问卷:一项效度和信度研究。
Appl Ergon. 2009 Mar;40(2):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
9
Development of a novel WOrk-Related Questionnaire for UPper extremity disorders (WORQ-UP).开发一种新的与工作相关的上肢疾病问卷(WORQ-UP)。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):823-833. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1246-7. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
10
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Hand20 questionnaire.土耳其版 Hand20 问卷的有效性和可靠性研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Aug 8;49(4):1243-1248. doi: 10.3906/sag-1808-168.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a work-related risk score for upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in a French working population.法国工作人群上肢肌肉骨骼疾病工作相关风险评分的开发与验证
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023 Nov 1;49(8):558-568. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4119. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of WOrk-Related Questionnaire for UPper Extremity Disorders (WORQ-UP).工作相关上肢疾病问卷(WORQ-UP)波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性。
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2023 Feb;28(1):102-107. doi: 10.1142/S2424835523500030. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
3
Proportion and Number of Upper-Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders Attributable to the Combined Effect of Biomechanical and Psychosocial Risk Factors in a Working Population.在工作人群中,与生物力学和心理社会风险因素共同作用相关的上肢肌肉骨骼疾病的比例和数量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 7;18(8):3858. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083858.
4
Musculoskeletal pain and its relation to individual and work-related factors: a cross-sectional study among Turkish office workers who work using computers.肌肉骨骼疼痛及其与个体和工作相关因素的关系:一项针对使用计算机办公的土耳其上班族的横断面研究。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Jun;28(2):790-797. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2020.1827528. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders: how many cases can be prevented? Estimates from the COSALI cohort.上肢肌肉骨骼疾病:有多少病例可以预防?COSALI 队列的估计。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 Nov 1;46(6):618-629. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3911. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
WOrk-Related Questionnaire for UPper extremity disorders (WORQ-UP): Factor Analysis and Internal Consistency.工作相关上肢疾患问卷(WORQ-UP):因子分析与内部一致性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1818-1826. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation.相关系数:合理使用与解释。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
8
Development of a novel WOrk-Related Questionnaire for UPper extremity disorders (WORQ-UP).开发一种新的与工作相关的上肢疾病问卷(WORQ-UP)。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):823-833. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1246-7. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
9
Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine.围手术期与疼痛医学领域问卷的开发、翻译及验证指南。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17.
10
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument.基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)以及如何选择结果测量仪器。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jan 19;20(2):105-13. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143.