Sharifuzzaman Md, Mun Hong-Seok, Ampode Keiven Mark B, Lagua Eddiemar B, Park Hae-Rang, Kim Young-Hwa, Hasan Md Kamrul, Yang Chul-Ju
Animal Nutrition and Feed Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea; Department of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj 8100, Bangladesh.
Animal Nutrition and Feed Science Laboratory, Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea; Department of Multimedia Engineering, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea.
Poult Sci. 2025 Feb;104(2):104668. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104668. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
The need for sustainable and safe alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters has driven researchers to explore organic acids (OAs) inclusion in broiler diets. Citric acid (CA), a notable OA, has emerged as a promising alternative due to its various physiological benefits, including improved nutrient digestibility, antioxidant properties, and enhanced weight gain. Despite the improved growth performance, the feed conversion ratio (FCR) does not seem to be consistently affected by CA inclusion. A considerable number of research papers suggest that CA can replace antibiotic growth promoters and has proved to be more effective when combined with other additives like probiotics and microbial phytase. However, despite numerous trials, the near-accurate dose remains in doubt. Dietary addition between 1.65 % and 2.65 % seems to positively affect broiler performance. Being an organic acid, CA brings no risk to the environment and does not economically burden producers. It has the capability to enhance certain meat qualities and extend shelf life. However, there is a risk of acidic stress and liver damage with excessive inclusion. This review study seeks to offer a thorough and all-encompassing summary of the present level of understanding regarding the use of CA supplementation in broiler diets by describing its impacts on growth efficiency, nutrient utilization, intestinal condition, immune response, meat quality, optimal dose, and environmental sustainability. Further research focused on determining precise dosage levels and understanding the synergistic or antagonistic effects of citric acid when combined with other feed additives is essential for optimizing broiler performance.
对抗生素生长促进剂可持续且安全的替代品的需求,促使研究人员探索在肉鸡日粮中添加有机酸(OA)。柠檬酸(CA)作为一种显著的有机酸,因其具有多种生理益处,包括提高养分消化率、抗氧化特性以及促进体重增加,已成为一种有前景的替代品。尽管生长性能有所改善,但饲料转化率(FCR)似乎并未因添加CA而持续受到影响。大量研究论文表明,CA可以替代抗生素生长促进剂,并且已证明与益生菌和微生物植酸酶等其他添加剂联合使用时更有效。然而,尽管进行了大量试验,但接近准确的剂量仍存疑问。日粮添加量在1.65%至2.65%之间似乎对肉鸡性能有积极影响。作为一种有机酸,CA对环境无风险,也不会给生产者带来经济负担。它有能力提高某些肉质并延长保质期。然而,过量添加存在酸性应激和肝脏损伤的风险。本综述研究旨在通过描述其对生长效率、养分利用、肠道状况、免疫反应、肉质、最佳剂量和环境可持续性的影响,全面且详尽地总结目前对在肉鸡日粮中添加CA的理解水平。进一步聚焦于确定精确剂量水平以及了解柠檬酸与其他饲料添加剂联合使用时的协同或拮抗作用的研究,对于优化肉鸡性能至关重要。