• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

54个低收入和中等收入国家成人药品的价格、可及性和可负担性:基于二次分析的证据

Prices, availability, and affordability of adult medicines in 54 low-income and middle-income countries: evidence based on a secondary analysis.

作者信息

Oldfield Lachlan, Penm Jonathan, Mirzaei Ardalan, Moles Rebekah

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Pharmacy, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jan;13(1):e50-e58. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00442-X.

DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00442-X
PMID:39706661
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication shortages are a pressing concern throughout the world. To gain insight into this issue, WHO and Health Action International (HAI) have constructed a validated method to survey medicine prices, availability, and affordability in low-income and middle-income countries. This paper aims to present an updated analysis of medicine affordability, availability, and pricing across 54 countries using the WHO-HAI method, highlighting disparities between public and private sectors.

METHODS

A search was conducted using the HAI Essential Medicines Access Database and four electronic databases to locate studies using the WHO-HAI method. A total of 71 surveys were included, spanning 54 countries. Data concerned with availability, affordability, and pricing were extracted and synthesised. Availability was defined as the average percentage of outlets stocking a medicine on the survey day; affordability was defined as the days' wages of the lowest-paid unskilled government worker required for a standard treatment; and prices were defined as the medicine's median price relative to the Management Sciences for Health international reference median price. Results are presented for the 15 most reported medicines that were included in at least 75% of surveys. Results are also presented for four commonly used medicines selected to facilitate comparison with previous secondary analyses.

FINDINGS

The average availability of generic medicines across WHO regions ranged from 37·8% to 68·3% in the public sector and from 42·3% to 77·4% in the private sector. The availability of originator brand medicines in the private sector ranged from 18·0% to 47·6% across these regions. Neither the public nor the private sector in any region met WHO's recommended availability target of 80%. Medicine prices were consistently high across all WHO regions, requiring patients to pay 3·0-11·5 times international reference prices for lowest-priced generic medicines and over 25 times international reference prices for originator products across WHO regions. Treatment of both acute and chronic illnesses remained unaffordable in many regions, requiring patients to pay 0·2-37·0 days' wages to purchase a single course of medicine.

INTERPRETATION

Access to essential medicines remains a global challenge. Medicines consistently display high prices, low affordability, and poor availability. Although there have been some advancements, the overall accessibility of essential medicines remains a substantial global concern. Innovative and targeted strategies are essential to enhance access, requiring a concerted effort from governments, health-care organisations, and international bodies to implement solutions that address both economic and logistical barriers.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

药品短缺是全球范围内的一个紧迫问题。为深入了解这一问题,世界卫生组织(WHO)和国际卫生行动组织(HAI)构建了一种经过验证的方法,用于调查低收入和中等收入国家的药品价格、可及性和可负担性。本文旨在使用WHO-HAI方法对54个国家的药品可负担性、可及性和定价进行更新分析,突出公共部门和私营部门之间的差异。

方法

利用HAI基本药物获取数据库和四个电子数据库进行检索,以查找使用WHO-HAI方法的研究。共纳入了71项调查,涉及54个国家。提取并综合了与可及性、可负担性和定价相关的数据。可及性定义为调查当天有药品库存的销售点的平均百分比;可负担性定义为标准治疗所需的最低工资非技术政府工作人员的日工资;价格定义为相对于健康管理科学国际参考中位价格的药品中位价格。给出了至少75%的调查中包含的15种报告最多的药品的结果。还给出了为便于与之前的二次分析进行比较而选择的四种常用药品的结果。

研究结果

WHO各区域通用药品在公共部门的平均可及性范围为37.8%至68.3%,在私营部门为42.3%至77.4%。这些区域私营部门中专利品牌药品的可及性范围为18.0%至47.6%。任何区域的公共部门和私营部门均未达到WHO建议的80%的可及性目标。WHO所有区域的药品价格一直居高不下,患者购买最低价格通用药品需支付国际参考价格的3.0至11.5倍,购买专利产品需支付国际参考价格的25倍以上。在许多地区,急性和慢性疾病的治疗费用仍然难以承受,患者购买一个疗程的药品需支付0.2至37.0天的工资。

解读

获取基本药物仍然是一项全球挑战。药品一直呈现出高价格、低可负担性和差可及性的特点。尽管已经取得了一些进展,但基本药物的总体可及性仍然是一个重大的全球问题。创新和有针对性的策略对于提高可及性至关重要,这需要政府、医疗保健组织和国际机构共同努力,实施解决经济和物流障碍的方案。

资金来源

无。

相似文献

1
Prices, availability, and affordability of adult medicines in 54 low-income and middle-income countries: evidence based on a secondary analysis.54个低收入和中等收入国家成人药品的价格、可及性和可负担性:基于二次分析的证据
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Jan;13(1):e50-e58. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00442-X.
2
Baseline assessment of WHO's target for both availability and affordability of essential medicines to treat non-communicable diseases.对世界卫生组织关于治疗非传染性疾病基本药物的可及性和可负担性目标的基线评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):e0171284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171284. eCollection 2017.
3
Availability, prices and affordability of self-monitoring blood glucose devices: surveys in six low-income and middle-income countries.自我监测血糖设备的可及性、价格及可负担性:六个低收入和中等收入国家的调查
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Feb 22;3(1):e001128. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001128. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Subsidising artemisinin-based combination therapy in the private retail sector.对私营零售部门基于青蒿素的联合疗法进行补贴。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 9;3(3):CD009926. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009926.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries: a secondary analysis.36个发展中国家和中等收入国家的药品价格、可及性及可负担性:一项二次分析
Lancet. 2009 Jan 17;373(9659):240-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61762-6. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
7
Evaluation of prices, availability and affordability of essential medicines in Lahore Division, Pakistan: A cross-sectional survey using WHO/HAI methodology.巴基斯坦拉合尔分部基本药物的价格、可及性和可负担性评估:使用世卫组织/卫生技术评估机构方法的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 25;14(4):e0216122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216122. eCollection 2019.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.无条件现金转移以减少贫困和脆弱性:对中低收入国家卫生服务利用和健康结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub3.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence, Determinants, and Time Trends of Cardiovascular Health in the WHO African Region.世界卫生组织非洲区域心血管健康的患病率、决定因素及时间趋势
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.3377.
2
Factors associated with fluoxetine adherence among outpatients with common mental disorders in Western Kenya.肯尼亚西部患有常见精神障碍的门诊患者中与氟西汀依从性相关的因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Aug 25;10(8):e017929. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017929.
3
Advancing the human right to health in cancer care through drug repurposing strategies.
通过药物重新利用策略促进癌症护理中的健康人权。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Aug 21;24(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02598-w.
4
Prices and Affordability of Essential Medicines in 72 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Markets.72个低收入、中等收入和高收入市场基本药物的价格与可负担性
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252043. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2043.
5
Interventions to mitigate drug shortages in public health systems in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.缓解撒哈拉以南非洲公共卫生系统药品短缺的干预措施:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 7;15(7):e101349. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101349.
6
A comparative study between Near-Infrared (NIR) spectrometer and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) on the sensitivity and specificity.近红外(NIR)光谱仪与高效液相色谱法(HPLC)在灵敏度和特异性方面的比较研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0319523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319523. eCollection 2025.