Laxar Daniel, Grassmann Daniel, Reischmann Lena, Kaider Alexandra, Schadler Bertram, Huber Carmen, Krammel Mario, Hafner Christina
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Spitalgasse 23, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Währinger Straße 104/10, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 20;32(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01309-8.
Emergency Medical Service crews are equipped with comprehensive emergency kits for routine care and to provide life-saving interventions in severely ill patients. While guidelines on contents and packing strategies of emergency kits for specific tasks and specialized situations exist, data for the design of out-of-hospital emergency kits in a general urban population is lacking. It may be possible to transfer the promising results of modern in-hospital packing strategies such as task-based package organization (TPO) to an Emergency Medical Service setting.
Four types of emergency kit were used in this study: two novel backpack emergency kits were acquired for this study (one packed using a TPO approach (PAX bags) and the other a traditional non-TPO approach (inter-rescue)); the existing emergency kit; and a TPO-repack of the existing kit. We recruited 80 paramedics who each performed four different tasks in a simulated setting: preparation for endotracheal intubation; preparing an intravenous access and a crystalloid infusion; preparing intraosseous access with medication; and preparing for a forearm splint. Questionnaires were completed before starting, after each task, and at the end of each study session.
There was no overall difference for the primary outcome of task completion between the novel TPO and novel non-TPO kit (p = 0.11). However, for selected tasks (forearm splint) completion time was significantly different between these kits. Overall, participants performed fastest when using the existing emergency kit. Participants frequently omitted items required for critical procedures, regardless of kit type.
TPO has been previously investigated in an in-hospital setting using participants with low exposure to medical emergencies, and with promising results. In our prehospital simulation setting with paramedics, equipment retrieval was neither faster nor more complete compared to non-TPO kits.
紧急医疗服务人员配备了综合急救箱,用于常规护理并对重症患者进行救生干预。虽然针对特定任务和特殊情况的急救箱内容和包装策略已有指南,但缺乏针对一般城市人群院外急救箱设计的数据。将基于任务的包装组织(TPO)等现代院内包装策略的良好成果应用于紧急医疗服务场景或许是可行的。
本研究使用了四种类型的急救箱:为本研究购置了两种新型背包急救箱(一种采用TPO方法包装(PAX袋),另一种采用传统非TPO方法(内部救援));现有的急救箱;以及现有急救箱的TPO重新包装版。我们招募了80名护理人员,他们每人在模拟场景中执行四项不同任务:准备气管插管;准备静脉通路和晶体液输注;准备骨内通路并用药;以及准备前臂夹板。在开始前、每项任务后以及每个研究阶段结束时完成问卷调查。
新型TPO急救箱和新型非TPO急救箱在任务完成的主要结果方面没有总体差异(p = 0.11)。然而,对于选定任务(前臂夹板),这些急救箱之间的完成时间存在显著差异。总体而言,参与者使用现有急救箱时执行速度最快。无论急救箱类型如何,参与者经常遗漏关键程序所需的物品。
TPO此前已在院内环境中对接触医疗紧急情况较少的参与者进行了研究,且结果良好。在我们对护理人员进行的院前模拟场景中,与非TPO急救箱相比,设备检索既没有更快也没有更完整。