Comparison of accuracy and axial length acquisition success rate by three types of swept-source OCT-based biometers.

PURPOSE

To compare three biometers equipped with swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT), including ARGOS (OCTB1), IOLMaster 700 (OCTB2), and Anterion (AS-OCTB). The primary aim was to assess the axial length (AL) acquisition success rates, and secondary aims included comparing parameters obtained from the three devices and evaluating postoperative refractive prediction errors.

SETTING

Chukyo Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Japan.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

METHODS

The study included patients undergoing preoperative assessments for cataract surgery using the three biometers. The AL acquisition success rates and parameters obtained from the three devices were compared and the postoperative refractive prediction errors (defined as the difference between subjective refractive error and predicted refractive error) were assessed at one month after surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 361 eyes from 361 patients. The AL acquisition success rates for all patients were 100.0% (n=361) (OCTB1), 98.6% (n=356) (OCTB2), and 96.7% (AS-OCTB) (P < .0001), and those for nuclear sclerosis of grade 4 or higher were 100.0%, 87.8%, and 87.8%, respectively (P = .007). The AL of mature cataract was measurable only with OCTB1 using the enhanced retina visualization mode. Although there were significant differences in parameters obtained on the three devices, there were no significant differences in postoperative refractive prediction errors.

CONCLUSIONS

OCTB1 demonstrated the highest AL acquisition success rate and was able to measure AL even in eyes with dense or mature cataract. AS-OCTB using a wavelength of 1300 nm showed lower AL acquisition success rates compared to the other two devices probably due to reduced light transmission through the vitreous body.