Fatemeh Bahrambeygi, Sakineh Rakhshanderou, Mohtasham Ghaffari
Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
School of Public Health & Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):1642. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12130-5.
Toward delivering appropriately safe, high quality and effective health care, healthcare organization should be health literate. This paper presents the development and psychometrics of an instrument for assessing the attributes of a health literate hospital which is called MAHLO-76 (Measure to Assess Health Literate Organization) here by authors.
The current study is methodological research which is involved two phases of tool development and psychometric evaluation. MAHLO primary item pool was prepared using the data extracted from the semi-structured, in-depth interviews and literature review. The face and content validity were evaluated applying qualitative and quantitative approaches. Exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation after Bartlett sphericity and KMO tests was used to evaluate the construct validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the structural factors, applying the most common goodness-of-fit indices. In order to determine internal consistency and test-retest stability, Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated respectively.
The initial tool after checking for duplicates and excluding was contained 79 items. In terms of face validity, 3 items were modified using qualitative method and none of the items had an impact score of less than 1.5. In the qualitative content validity assessment, 16 items were revised and none of the items had CVR score less than 0.59 and CVI score less than 0.79. The results of the EFA obtained from the KMO showed the adequacy of the sample size (KMO value = 0.884) and the Bartlett's sphericity test showed a significant correlation between the items (χ2 = 38124.040, df = 3081, P < 0.0001). The exploratory factor analysis indicated that 14 initially extracted factors explained 63.716% of the total variance. In Confirmatory factor analysis, the chi-square was 205.016 and other model fit indices including NFI:0.812, NNFI:0.875, CFI:0.919, IFI:0.921, MFI:0.857, GFI:0.930, AGFI:0.918, RMR:0.051, RMSEA:0.06 were calculated. In reliability assessment, Cronbach's alpha was 0.94 and the value of ICC was 0.98.
Measure to Assess Health Literate Organization (MAHLO-76) is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used as assessment as well as self-assessment tool in hospital settings. Its application could disclosure those organizational health literacy aspects in clinical environments that need necessary interventions.
为提供适当安全、高质量且有效的医疗保健服务,医疗机构应具备健康素养。本文介绍了一种用于评估具备健康素养医院属性的工具的开发及心理测量学特性,作者将其命名为MAHLO - 76(评估健康素养组织的测量工具)。
本研究为方法学研究,包括工具开发和心理测量学评估两个阶段。MAHLO初始项目池通过从半结构化深度访谈和文献综述中提取的数据编制而成。采用定性和定量方法评估表面效度和内容效度。在进行Bartlett球形检验和KMO检验后,使用方差最大化旋转的探索性因子分析来评估结构效度。采用最常用的拟合优度指标进行验证性因子分析以评估结构因子。为确定内部一致性和重测稳定性,分别计算了Cronbach's alpha系数和组内相关系数。
经过查重和排除后,初始工具包含79个项目。在表面效度方面,采用定性方法修改了3个项目,且所有项目的影响得分均不低于1.5。在定性内容效度评估中,修订了16个项目,且所有项目的CVR得分均不低于0.59,CVI得分均不低于0.79。从KMO得到的探索性因子分析结果显示样本量充足(KMO值 = 0.884),Bartlett球形检验表明项目间存在显著相关性(χ2 = 38124.040,df = 3081,P < 0.0001)。探索性因子分析表明,最初提取的14个因子解释了总方差的63.716%。在验证性因子分析中,计算得到卡方值为205.016,其他模型拟合指标包括NFI:0.812、NNFI:0.875、CFI:0.919、IFI:0.921、MFI:0.857、GFI:0.930、AGFI:0.918、RMR:0.051、RMSEA:0.06。在可靠性评估中,Cronbach's alpha系数为0.94,ICC值为0.98。
评估健康素养组织的测量工具(MAHLO - 76)是一种有效且可靠的工具,可在医院环境中用作评估及自我评估工具。其应用能够揭示临床环境中那些需要必要干预的组织健康素养方面。