• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队凝聚力对大学生篮球联赛中运动员参与度的影响:家长式领导的调节作用。

The impact of team cohesion on athlete engagement in collegiate basketball leagues: the moderating role of paternalistic leadership.

作者信息

Wang Liang, Xu Jianhua, Liu Yao

机构信息

School of Physical Education and Sport Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 10;15:1473506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1473506. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1473506
PMID:39720679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11668273/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the impact of team cohesion on the engagement of college basketball players, and examines the moderating effects of authoritarian, benevolent, and moral leadership styles within paternalistic leadership on this influence. This provides theoretical insights for improving athlete engagement.

METHODS

Data from 404 athletes participating in the 26th China Collegiate Basketball League were collected through a questionnaire survey and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

(1) Team cohesion has a significant positive impact on athlete engagement in collegiate basketball players. (2) Authoritarian leadership has a significant negative moderating effect on the relationship between team cohesion and athlete engagement in collegiate basketball players; the stronger the authoritarian leadership, the weaker the positive impact of team cohesion on athlete engagement in collegiate basketball players. This effect diminishes and becomes statistically insignificant when the authoritarian leadership score exceeds 5.88. (3) Benevolent leadership does not have a significant moderating effect between team cohesion and athlete engagement in collegiate basketball players. (4) Moral leadership has a significant positive moderating effect on the relationship between team cohesion and athlete engagement in collegiate basketball players; the higher the moral leadership, the stronger the positive impact of team cohesion on athlete engagement in collegiate basketball players, which becomes insignificant when the moral leadership score is below 2.75.

CONCLUSION

Enhancing team cohesion is an effective method to increase athlete engagement in collegiate basketball players. It is advisable for collegiate basketball coaches to refrain from adopting controlling and demeaning authoritative approaches, and instead, emphasize ethical leadership practices, continually enhancing their own abilities and virtues to serve as role models.

摘要

目的

本研究调查团队凝聚力对大学生篮球运动员参与度的影响,并考察家长式领导中的专制、仁慈和道德领导风格对这种影响的调节作用。这为提高运动员参与度提供了理论见解。

方法

通过问卷调查收集了参加第26届中国大学生篮球联赛的404名运动员的数据,并进行了统计分析。

结果

(1)团队凝聚力对大学生篮球运动员的运动员参与度有显著的正向影响。(2)专制领导对大学生篮球运动员团队凝聚力与运动员参与度之间的关系有显著的负向调节作用;专制领导越强,团队凝聚力对大学生篮球运动员参与度的正向影响越弱。当专制领导得分超过5.88时,这种影响减弱并变得在统计上不显著。(3)仁慈领导在大学生篮球运动员团队凝聚力与运动员参与度之间没有显著的调节作用。(4)道德领导对大学生篮球运动员团队凝聚力与运动员参与度之间的关系有显著的正向调节作用;道德领导越高,团队凝聚力对大学生篮球运动员参与度的正向影响越强,当道德领导得分低于2.75时,这种影响变得不显著。

结论

增强团队凝聚力是提高大学生篮球运动员参与度的有效方法。大学生篮球教练应避免采用控制和贬低的权威方式,而应强调道德领导实践,不断提高自身能力和品德,树立榜样。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/7b644ed554d9/fpsyg-15-1473506-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/5a80e86a3bd4/fpsyg-15-1473506-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/307bf815fd74/fpsyg-15-1473506-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/a09961dd6720/fpsyg-15-1473506-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/baf134e146bb/fpsyg-15-1473506-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/7b644ed554d9/fpsyg-15-1473506-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/5a80e86a3bd4/fpsyg-15-1473506-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/307bf815fd74/fpsyg-15-1473506-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/a09961dd6720/fpsyg-15-1473506-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/baf134e146bb/fpsyg-15-1473506-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f01c/11668273/7b644ed554d9/fpsyg-15-1473506-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of team cohesion on athlete engagement in collegiate basketball leagues: the moderating role of paternalistic leadership.团队凝聚力对大学生篮球联赛中运动员参与度的影响:家长式领导的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 10;15:1473506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1473506. eCollection 2024.
2
Does Fair Coach Behavior Predict the Quality of Athlete Leadership Among Belgian Volleyball and Basketball Players: The Vital Role of Team Identification and Task Cohesion.公平教练行为能否预测比利时排球和篮球运动员的运动员领导力质量:团队认同和任务凝聚力的重要作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 7;12:645764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645764. eCollection 2021.
3
Impact of foreign players' participation in the Palestinian basketball league on team cohesion from the perspective of local players.从本土球员视角看外国球员参与巴勒斯坦篮球联赛对球队凝聚力的影响
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 19;16:1545018. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1545018. eCollection 2025.
4
The Relationship Between Soccer Participation and Team Cohesion for Adolescents: A Chain-Mediated Effect of Athlete Engagement and Collective Self-Esteem.青少年足球参与与团队凝聚力之间的关系:运动员投入和集体自尊的链式中介效应
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 31;15(2):155. doi: 10.3390/bs15020155.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of Chinese coach leadership and athlete satisfaction and cohesion.中国教练领导力与运动员满意度及凝聚力的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 25;15:1385178. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1385178. eCollection 2024.
6
Developing players for athlete leadership groups in professional football teams: Qualitative insights from head coaches and athlete leaders.为职业足球队的运动员领导团队培养球员:主教练和运动员领袖的定性洞察。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0271093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271093. eCollection 2022.
7
Assessing athlete leadership and cohesion using a social network analysis approach.使用社会网络分析方法评估运动员领导力与凝聚力。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1050385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1050385. eCollection 2023.
8
Effect of paternalistic leadership on Chinese youth elite athletes' satisfaction: Resilience as a moderator.家长式领导对中国青年精英运动员满意度的影响:以心理韧性作为调节变量
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:1008163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008163. eCollection 2022.
9
Team Cohesion in Individual/Team Sports Athletes: Transformational Leadership and the Role of Social norms.个人/团队运动运动员的团队凝聚力:变革型领导与社会规范的作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;11(6):792. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060792.
10
Ethical climate in higher education: The interplay of leadership, moral efficacy, and team cohesion in diverse cultural contexts.高等教育中的道德氛围:不同文化背景下领导力、道德效能与团队凝聚力的相互作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 May;255:104986. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104986. Epub 2025 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The associations of transformational leadership and team cohesion on the psychological health of young football players through basic psychological needs.变革型领导与团队凝聚力对青少年足球运动员心理健康的影响:基于基本心理需求的中介作用
Sci Med Footb. 2024 Aug;8(3):222-231. doi: 10.1080/24733938.2023.2194287. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Relationships among Sports Group Cohesion, Passion, and Mental Toughness in Chinese Team Sports Athletes.中国团体运动运动员的运动群体凝聚力、激情与心理韧性的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;19(22):15209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215209.
3
The associations among athlete gratitude, athlete engagement, athlete burnout: A cross-lagged study in China.
运动员感恩、运动员投入与运动员倦怠之间的关联:一项在中国的交叉滞后研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:996144. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996144. eCollection 2022.
4
Effect of paternalistic leadership on Chinese youth elite athletes' satisfaction: Resilience as a moderator.家长式领导对中国青年精英运动员满意度的影响:以心理韧性作为调节变量
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:1008163. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008163. eCollection 2022.
5
Relationships among Sports Group Cohesion, Psychological Collectivism, Mental Toughness and Athlete Engagement in Chinese Team Sports Athletes.运动群体凝聚力、心理集体主义、心理韧性与中国集体项目运动员参赛投入的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):4987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094987.