Brody J P, Binkley J H, Harding S A
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Nov;10(5):708-11. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.5.708-711.1979.
Two commercially available rapid screening tests, Rubacell (Abbott Laboratories; passive hemagglutination) and FIAX (International Diagnostic Technology; indirect immunofluorescence) were compared with a standard hemagglutination inhibition assay for detection of immunity to rubella infection. In tests of approximately 300 sera, both rapid assays were specific and sensitive and showed a high predictive value of a positive result. Within-run reproducibility studies were excellent for both tests; however, Rubacell was superior to FIAX with respect to time-cost analysis.
将两种市售快速筛查试验,即鲁巴塞尔(雅培实验室;被动血凝试验)和FIAX(国际诊断技术公司;间接免疫荧光法)与标准血凝抑制试验进行比较,以检测风疹感染的免疫力。在对大约300份血清的检测中,两种快速检测方法均具有特异性和敏感性,且阳性结果的预测价值很高。两种检测方法的批内重复性研究结果都很好;然而,在时间成本分析方面,鲁巴塞尔优于FIAX。