Suppr超能文献

两种检测风疹感染免疫力检测方法的评估与比较

Evaluation and comparison of two assays for detection of immunity to rubella infection.

作者信息

Brody J P, Binkley J H, Harding S A

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Nov;10(5):708-11. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.5.708-711.1979.

Abstract

Two commercially available rapid screening tests, Rubacell (Abbott Laboratories; passive hemagglutination) and FIAX (International Diagnostic Technology; indirect immunofluorescence) were compared with a standard hemagglutination inhibition assay for detection of immunity to rubella infection. In tests of approximately 300 sera, both rapid assays were specific and sensitive and showed a high predictive value of a positive result. Within-run reproducibility studies were excellent for both tests; however, Rubacell was superior to FIAX with respect to time-cost analysis.

摘要

将两种市售快速筛查试验,即鲁巴塞尔(雅培实验室;被动血凝试验)和FIAX(国际诊断技术公司;间接免疫荧光法)与标准血凝抑制试验进行比较,以检测风疹感染的免疫力。在对大约300份血清的检测中,两种快速检测方法均具有特异性和敏感性,且阳性结果的预测价值很高。两种检测方法的批内重复性研究结果都很好;然而,在时间成本分析方面,鲁巴塞尔优于FIAX。

相似文献

2
Clinical evaluation of a rubella passive hemagglutination test system.
J Med Virol. 1979;3(3):231-6. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890030309.
7
Comparison of different methods for assessment of rubella infection and immunity.不同风疹感染及免疫评估方法的比较
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol. 1982 Sep;252(4):431-7.

本文引用的文献

3
Rubella-virus hemagglutination-inhibition test.风疹病毒血凝抑制试验
N Engl J Med. 1967 Mar 9;276(10):554-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196703092761006.
5
Evaluation of an immunodiffusion test for screening of rubella immunity.
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand C. 1976 Apr;84(2):153-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1976.tb00014.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验