Fayram S L, Akin S, Aarnaes S L, Peterson E M, de la Maza L M
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 Jan;25(1):178-80. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.1.178-180.1987.
Three assays for detection of rubella antibodies, Rubella G (fluorescence immunoassay [FIA]), Rubacell (passive hemagglutination), and Rubaquick (passive hemagglutination with rotation), were compared with hemagglutination inhibition. A total of 100 serum specimens were selected, 68 of which had an FIA value of less than or equal to 25. On initial testing, among the four tests, there was agreement for 88 specimens for assignment of rubella immune status. On repeat testing, all the results agreed by the hemagglutination inhibition, passive hemagglutination, and passive hemagglutination rotation methods, and only one discrepant specimen remained by FIA.
将三种检测风疹抗体的检测方法,即风疹G(荧光免疫测定法[FIA])、Rubacell(被动血凝反应)和Rubaquick(旋转被动血凝反应)与血凝抑制试验进行了比较。总共选取了100份血清标本,其中68份的FIA值小于或等于25。在初次检测时,在这四种检测方法中,有88份标本在风疹免疫状态的判定上达成了一致。在重复检测时,血凝抑制试验、被动血凝反应和旋转被动血凝反应方法的所有结果都一致,而FIA仅剩下一份有差异的标本。