Suppr超能文献

商用风疹病毒抗体检测试剂盒的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of commercial rubella virus antibody kits.

作者信息

Wittenburg R A, Roberts M A, Elliott L B, Little L M

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Feb;21(2):161-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.2.161-163.1985.

Abstract

Comparative evaluation of six commercial rubella virus antibody kits is described. A set of serum samples skewed toward nonreactive and low-positive rubella antibody levels was used because the goal of an immunity screening test is the detection of susceptible individuals. The M. A. Bioproducts Rubastat and the Hynson, Westcott and Dunning Rubascan were superior in achieving high sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility. They also were the easiest and fastest tests to perform, and they require equipment available in most laboratories.

摘要

本文描述了六种市售风疹病毒抗体检测试剂盒的比较评估。由于免疫筛查试验的目的是检测易感个体,因此使用了一组偏向于风疹抗体水平无反应和低阳性的血清样本。M.A.生物制品公司的Rubastat和Hynson、Westcott及Dunning公司的Rubascan在实现高灵敏度、特异性和可重复性方面表现出色。它们也是操作最简单、最快的检测方法,并且大多数实验室都具备所需设备。

相似文献

7
Rubella diagnostic tests: what is a significant result?风疹诊断测试:什么是显著结果?
Postgrad Med. 1982 Mar;71(3):73-7. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1982.11716013.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验