Truant A L, Barksdale B L, Huber T W, Elliott L B
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jan;17(1):106-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.1.106-108.1983.
Comparative evaluations of immune status for rubella virus are described for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, hemagglutination inhibition, and indirect hemagglutination. A 92.1% agreement between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and indirect hemagglutination assay was demonstrated for rubella immune status. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and hemagglutination inhibition demonstrated a 92.6% agreement and were compared in an attempt to define the quantitative usefulness of comparisons of single sera for determining immune status. These data support the relative lack of correlation between single enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and hemagglutination inhibition quantitative values. Enzyme immunoassay was, however, an acceptable alternative to hemagglutination inhibition for the determination of immune status to rubella virus.
本文描述了采用酶联免疫吸附测定法、血凝抑制试验和间接血凝试验对风疹病毒免疫状态进行的比较评估。酶联免疫吸附测定法与间接血凝试验在风疹免疫状态评估方面的一致性为92.1%。酶联免疫吸附测定法与血凝抑制试验的一致性为92.6%,并对二者进行了比较,以确定单次血清检测结果比较在判定免疫状态方面的定量效用。这些数据表明,单次酶联免疫吸附测定结果与血凝抑制试验定量值之间相对缺乏相关性。不过,酶免疫测定法在风疹病毒免疫状态判定方面是血凝抑制试验的可接受替代方法。