Simor A E, Chua R, Low D E
Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Aug;26(8):1582-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1582-1583.1988.
A new enzyme immunoassay (Rubenostika; Organon Teknika, Turnhout, Belgium), a new latex agglutination test (Rubalex; Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland), and three other accepted methods for the determination of rubella immunity were compared with a standard hemagglutination inhibition assay. Of 224 serum samples tested, 54 (24%) were nonreactive and 24 (11%) were low titered. All procedures were very specific (94 to 100%). Rubenostika was the least sensitive method (88%), and Rubalex was the most sensitive (98%).
将一种新型酶免疫测定法（鲁贝诺斯塔卡；奥加农·泰尼克公司，比利时特尔赫特）、一种新型乳胶凝集试验（鲁贝莱克斯；奥立安诊断公司，芬兰埃斯波）以及其他三种公认的风疹免疫力测定方法与标准血凝抑制试验进行了比较。在检测的224份血清样本中，54份（24%）无反应，24份（11%）滴度较低。所有检测方法的特异性都很高（94%至100%）。鲁贝诺斯塔卡是最不敏感的方法（88%），而鲁贝莱克斯是最敏感的（98%）。
