• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙周病患者借助时间权衡法和标准博弈技术在临床决策中的偏好与选择——一项横断面研究

Preferences and choice in clinical decision-making with the help of time trade-off and standard gamble techniques among periodontally compromised patients - A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Paul Budhaditya, Srivastava Ankita

机构信息

Department of Public Health Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2024 May-Jun;28(3):319-324. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_471_23. Epub 2024 Dec 2.

DOI:10.4103/jisp.jisp_471_23
PMID:39742068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11684566/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the validity of time trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG) techniques of utility valuation among patients with periodontal problems by assessing their relation to two logical constructs; Gingival Index (GI) and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) Questionnaire.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and one patients aged 18 years old and above, who visited a tertiary care hospital for treatment/consultation were included. A questionnaire was administered to record the TTO, SG, and OHIP. GI, measuring the severity of the disease, was recorded. Bivariate and backward multiple regression analyses were done to find an association between the oral health utility values, OHIP, and the variables of interest (demographic and clinical characteristics including GI).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant decrease in the TTO and SG utilities ( < 0.05) as the severity of the disease progressed from mild to severe. GI, as well as OHIP scores, were significant predictors in the case of both the TTO as well as SG ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TTO and SG utilities were found to be valid and correlated well with clinical findings. Health utilities serve as useful and reliable markers of health-related quality of life among individuals as well as communities.

摘要

背景

通过评估时间权衡法(TTO)和标准博弈法(SG)与两个逻辑结构即牙龈指数(GI)和口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP)问卷之间的关系,来评估牙周疾病患者效用评估技术的有效性。

材料与方法

纳入201名18岁及以上到三级医院接受治疗/咨询的患者。采用问卷记录TTO、SG和OHIP。记录测量疾病严重程度的GI。进行双变量和向后多元回归分析,以找出口腔健康效用值、OHIP与感兴趣的变量(人口统计学和临床特征,包括GI)之间的关联。

结果

随着疾病严重程度从轻度发展到重度,TTO和SG效用值有统计学意义的下降(<0.05)。在TTO和SG两种情况下,GI以及OHIP评分都是显著的预测因素(<0.05)。

结论

发现TTO和SG效用是有效的,且与临床结果相关性良好。健康效用是个体以及社区中与健康相关生活质量的有用且可靠的指标。

相似文献

1
Preferences and choice in clinical decision-making with the help of time trade-off and standard gamble techniques among periodontally compromised patients - A cross-sectional study.牙周病患者借助时间权衡法和标准博弈技术在临床决策中的偏好与选择——一项横断面研究
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2024 May-Jun;28(3):319-324. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_471_23. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
2
Validity of EuroQOL-5D, time trade-off, and standard gamble for age-related macular degeneration in the Singapore population.新加坡人群年龄相关性黄斑变性 EuroQOL-5D、时间权衡和标准博弈的有效性。
Eye (Lond). 2012 Mar;26(3):379-88. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.218. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
3
Impact of caregiver and parenting status on time trade-off and standard gamble utility scores for health state descriptions.照料者和父母身份对健康状态描述的时间权衡和标准博弈效用评分的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 9;12:48. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-48.
4
Examination of assumptions in using time tradeoff and standard gamble utilities in individuals with spinal cord injury.使用时间权衡和标准赌博效用在脊髓损伤个体中的假设检验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Feb;93(2):245-52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.08.039.
5
Dental health state utilities among dental patients.牙科患者的口腔健康状况效用。
J Public Health Dent. 2019 Mar;79(2):147-153. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12306. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
Validity of the time trade-off and standard gamble methods of utility assessment in retinal patients.视网膜疾病患者效用评估中时间权衡法和标准博弈法的有效性
Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 May;86(5):493-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.5.493.
7
Validity, feasibility and acceptability of time trade-off and standard gamble assessments in health valuation studies: a study in a multiethnic Asian population in Singapore.健康评估研究中时间权衡法和标准博弈法评估的有效性、可行性及可接受性:新加坡多民族亚洲人群的一项研究
Value Health. 2008 Mar;11 Suppl 1:S3-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00361.x.
8
The standard gamble showed better construct validity than the time trade-off.标准博弈法比时间权衡法显示出更好的结构效度。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;60(10):1029-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 May 17.
9
Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈癌患者健康状态效用测量的比较
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Aug;141(8):696-703. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.1314.
10
A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities.对时间权衡效用与标准博弈效用差异的一种新解释。
Health Econ. 2002 Jul;11(5):447-56. doi: 10.1002/hec.688.

本文引用的文献

1
Health utility attributable to oral conditions in Japanese adults.日本成年人的口腔状况相关健康效用。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2024 Dec;52(6):911-918. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12997. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
A discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for a chronic disease screening programme in Queensland, Australia.一项用于引出澳大利亚昆士兰州慢性病筛查项目偏好的离散选择实验。
Public Health. 2024 Mar;228:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
3
Quantifying health utilities of young adult orthodontic patients using the time trade-off method: a cross-sectional study.采用时间权衡法量化青少年正畸患者的健康效用:一项横断面研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2023 Jun 5;28(2):e2321238. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.2.e2321238.oar. eCollection 2023.
4
Developing an Australian utility value set for the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale-4D (ECOHIS-4D) using a discrete choice experiment.采用离散选择实验开发澳大利亚婴幼儿口腔健康影响量表-4 维度(ECOHIS-4D)效用值集。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Nov;24(8):1285-1296. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01542-x. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
5
Prevalence of periodontal disease among adults in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.印度成年人牙周病患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;10(4):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
6
Dental health state utilities among dental patients.牙科患者的口腔健康状况效用。
J Public Health Dent. 2019 Mar;79(2):147-153. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12306. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
7
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):14-8.
8
Gingival diseases in childhood - a review.儿童牙龈疾病——综述
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Oct;8(10):ZE01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9004.4957. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
9
Dental patient preferences and choice in clinical decision-making.牙科患者在临床决策中的偏好与选择。
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2012;53(2):59-66. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.53.59.
10
Predictors of risk tolerance among oral surgery patients.口腔外科患者风险承受能力的预测因素。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Dec;68(12):2947-54. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Aug 3.