Hernandez Torres Sofia I, Caldwell Nicole W, Snider Eric J
Organ Support and Automation Technologies Group, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Dec 15;11(12):1271. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11121271.
Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in both military and civilian trauma settings. Oftentimes, the control and treatment of hemorrhage requires central vascular access and well-trained medical personnel. Automated technology is being developed that can lower the skill threshold for life-saving interventions. Here, we conduct independent evaluation testing of one such device, the Vu-Path™ Ultrasound Guidance system, or Vu-Path™. The device was designed to simplify needle insertion using a needle holder that ensures the needle is within the ultrasound field of view during its insertion into tissue, along with guidance lines shown on the user interface. We evaluated the performance of this device in a range of laboratory, animal, and human testing platforms. Overall, the device had a high success rate, achieving an 83% insertion accuracy in live animal testing across both normal and hypotensive blood pressures. Vu-Path™ was faster than manual, ultrasound-guided needle insertion and was nearly 1.5 times quicker for arterial and 2.3 times quicker for venous access. Human usability feedback highlighted that 80% of the participants would use this device for central line placement. Study users noted that the guidance lines and small form factor were useful design features. However, issues were raised regarding the needle insertion angle being too steep, with potential positioning challenges as the needle remains fixed to the ultrasound probe. Regardless, 75% of the participants believed that personnel with any level of clinical background could use the device for central vascular access. Overall, Vu-Path™ performed well across a range of testing situations, and potential design improvements were noted. With adjustments to the device, central vascular access can be made more accessible on battlefields in the future.
出血仍然是军事和民用创伤环境中主要的死亡原因。通常情况下,出血的控制和治疗需要中心血管通路以及训练有素的医务人员。正在开发的自动化技术可以降低救生干预措施的技能门槛。在此,我们对一种这样的设备——Vu-Path™超声引导系统(即Vu-Path™)进行独立评估测试。该设备旨在通过一个持针器简化进针过程,该持针器可确保在将针插入组织时针处于超声视野内,同时用户界面上会显示引导线。我们在一系列实验室、动物和人体测试平台上评估了该设备的性能。总体而言,该设备成功率很高,在正常血压和低血压的活体动物测试中进针准确率达到83%。Vu-Path™比手动超声引导进针更快,动脉穿刺快近1.5倍,静脉穿刺快2.3倍。人体可用性反馈表明,80%的参与者会使用该设备进行中心静脉置管。研究用户指出引导线和小尺寸是有用的设计特点。然而,也有人提出进针角度太陡的问题,且由于针固定在超声探头上,存在潜在的定位挑战。尽管如此,75%的参与者认为任何临床背景水平的人员都可以使用该设备进行中心血管通路操作。总体而言,Vu-Path™在一系列测试情况下表现良好,并指出了潜在的设计改进方向。通过对该设备进行调整,未来在战场上进行中心血管通路操作将更加容易。