Siegel E, Gillings D, Campbell S, Guild P
Am J Public Health. 1985 Mar;75(3):246-53. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.3.246.
The impact of a rural regional perinatal care (RPC) program was assessed by a quasi-experimental, controlled, population-based design. Outcome measures included changes in five-year average fetal and neonatal mortality rates as well as short-term obstetric and newborn morbidity. Declines in fetal and neonatal as well as birthweight specific mortality rates were observed for both pilot and control regions, for both races, and especially for 1501-2500 g infants. However, comparisons of preprogram (1966-74) and postprogram (1975-80) average yearly changes showed no statistically significant differences between regions. While the incidence of prenatal morbidity was the same for both regions, intrapartum and newborn morbidity significantly favored the pilot region. These results were difficult to interpret. Program relevant implications of the findings in relation to rural RPC in North Carolina are discussed. Specific benefits appeared to be associated with the development of two high-risk maternity clinics and a Level II center capability in the pilot region. The importance of community support and public/private sector cooperation in relation to RPC is noted.
通过一项准实验性、对照、基于人群的设计,对农村地区围产期护理(RPC)项目的影响进行了评估。结果指标包括五年平均胎儿和新生儿死亡率的变化以及短期产科和新生儿发病率。在试点地区和对照地区,无论种族,尤其是对于体重在1501 - 2500克的婴儿,观察到胎儿、新生儿以及按出生体重划分的死亡率均有所下降。然而,对项目实施前(1966 - 1974年)和项目实施后(1975 - 1980年)平均年度变化的比较显示,各地区之间在统计学上没有显著差异。虽然两个地区产前发病率相同,但产时和新生儿发病率明显有利于试点地区。这些结果难以解释。讨论了这些发现在北卡罗来纳州农村RPC方面与项目相关的意义。具体益处似乎与试点地区两个高危产科诊所的发展以及二级中心能力的提升有关。还指出了社区支持以及公共/私营部门合作在RPC方面的重要性。