Almosa Naif, Alaman Khalid, Alkhudairi Fares, Alhaqbani Muhannad, Alshalawi Mohammed, Zawawi Rahaf
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169-38, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169-38, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 10;17(24):6030. doi: 10.3390/ma17246030.
This study aimed to evaluate the change in enamel color and surface micro-hardness following the use of resin-infiltration concept material (ICON) and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate (CPP-ACFP) remineralizing agent. Fifty-four extracted human third molars were collected and randomly divided into three groups: group A: control with no surface treatment; group B: treated using ICON; and group C: treated using CPP-ACFP. The change in color and micro-hardness of the enamel surface were measured using spectrophotometer and Vickers hardness number, respectively. The measurements were taken at three timelines; baseline (BL), after demineralization (DM), and after surface treatment (TX). The three groups showed no significant differences in enamel color change after demineralization ( < 0.05). However, after surface treatment in relation to the baseline, groups B and C had a significant increase in color change compared to the control group ( < 0.05), and group B showed a statistically significant increase in enamel color changes compared to group C. Additionally, all groups exhibited a significant reduction in enamel micro-hardness after demineralization in comparison to their baseline ( < 0.05). Group C showed a significant increase in micro-hardness after surface treatment compared to groups A and B ( < 0.05), while group B showed a significant decrease in enamel micro-hardness compared to groups A and C ( < 0.05). These findings suggest that teeth treated with CPP-amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate (CPP-ACFP) show a significant improvement in enamel surface color after demineralization compared to the teeth treated with resin infiltration (ICON) and the non-treated teeth. Additionally, enamel surfaces treated with CPP-ACFP show significant enamel hardness regaining, while resin infiltration (ICON) compromises enamel surface hardness.
本研究旨在评估使用树脂渗透概念材料(ICON)和酪蛋白磷酸肽 - 无定形氟化钙磷酸盐(CPP - ACFP)再矿化剂后牙釉质颜色和表面显微硬度的变化。收集了54颗拔除的人类第三磨牙,并随机分为三组:A组:未进行表面处理的对照组;B组:使用ICON处理;C组:使用CPP - ACFP处理。分别使用分光光度计和维氏硬度值测量牙釉质表面颜色和显微硬度的变化。在三个时间点进行测量:基线(BL)、脱矿后(DM)和表面处理后(TX)。三组在脱矿后牙釉质颜色变化方面无显著差异(<0.05)。然而,与基线相比,表面处理后,B组和C组的颜色变化相较于对照组有显著增加(<0.05),并且B组相较于C组在牙釉质颜色变化上显示出统计学上的显著增加。此外,与各自的基线相比,所有组在脱矿后牙釉质显微硬度均显著降低(<0.05)。与A组和B组相比,C组在表面处理后显微硬度显著增加(<0.05),而B组相较于A组和C组牙釉质显微硬度显著降低(<0.05)。这些发现表明,与用树脂渗透(ICON)处理的牙齿和未处理的牙齿相比,用酪蛋白磷酸肽 - 无定形氟化钙磷酸盐(CPP - ACFP)处理的牙齿在脱矿后牙釉质表面颜色有显著改善。此外,用CPP - ACFP处理的牙釉质表面显示出显著的牙釉质硬度恢复,而树脂渗透(ICON)会损害牙釉质表面硬度。