Willingham Mark L, Teria Rodney S, Dulana Louis, Badowski Grazyna, Cassel Kevin D
University of Hawai'i Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo St, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
UOG Station, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam, 96923, USA.
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 May;36(5):521-530. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01956-3. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a sampling method that relies on social networks to recruit hard-to-reach populations, and reduces the bias from non-random selection. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of RDS in collecting health assessment data from underrepresented populations not captured by traditional sampling techniques.
An RDS study was conducted in Hawai'i between 2017 and 2018 of Native Hawaiians, Chuukese, and Marshallese participants. 1006 cases consisting of 352 seeds and 654 recruits were analyzed in conjunction with data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), filtered to include Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander participants (n = 1564). Missing network size data was imputed by RDSAnalyst and determined by the sample median network size. Weighted samples were compared for differences.
Chi-square testing revealed significant differences between the RDS and BRFSS weighted samples across sex, age, education, income, and colon/cervical cancer screening variables. Only BMI group and smoking status exhibited no significant differences. RDS methods recruited participants efficiently within one year.
The findings indicate that RDS offers an effective sampling methodology when trying to reach hidden populations and provides more insight into the social networks of underserved communities as the transfer/utilization of health information may be linked to social connectedness.
应答驱动抽样(RDS)是一种依靠社交网络招募难以接触到的人群的抽样方法,可减少非随机选择带来的偏差。本研究旨在评估RDS在从传统抽样技术未涵盖的代表性不足的人群中收集健康评估数据方面的有效性。
2017年至2018年在夏威夷对夏威夷原住民、楚克族和马绍尔族参与者进行了一项RDS研究。结合2018年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)的数据,对由352名种子参与者和654名新招募参与者组成的1006个案例进行了分析,筛选后纳入夏威夷原住民/其他太平洋岛民参与者(n = 1564)。缺失的网络规模数据由RDSAnalyst估算,并根据样本中位数网络规模确定。对加权样本进行差异比较。
卡方检验显示,RDS和BRFSS加权样本在性别、年龄、教育程度、收入以及结肠癌/宫颈癌筛查变量方面存在显著差异。只有体重指数组和吸烟状况没有显著差异。RDS方法在一年内有效地招募了参与者。
研究结果表明,在试图接触隐藏人群时,RDS提供了一种有效的抽样方法,并且由于健康信息的传递/利用可能与社会联系相关,因此能更深入地了解服务不足社区的社交网络。