应答驱动抽样在少数族裔人群健康评估中的效果。

The efficacy of respondent-driven sampling for the health assessment of minority populations.

作者信息

Badowski Grazyna, Somera Lilnabeth P, Simsiman Brayan, Lee Hye-Ryeon, Cassel Kevin, Yamanaka Alisha, Ren JunHao

机构信息

University of Guam, College of Natural & Applied Sciences, 303 University Drive, Mangilao, Guam 96923, United States.

University of Guam, Division of Communication and Fine Arts, 303 University Drive, Mangilao, Guam 96923, United States.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;50(Pt B):214-220. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.07.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Respondent driven sampling (RDS) is a relatively new network sampling technique typically employed for hard-to-reach populations. Like snowball sampling, initial respondents or "seeds" recruit additional respondents from their network of friends. Under certain assumptions, the method promises to produce a sample independent from the biases that may have been introduced by the non-random choice of "seeds." We conducted a survey on health communication in Guam's general population using the RDS method, the first survey that has utilized this methodology in Guam. It was conducted in hopes of identifying a cost-efficient non-probability sampling strategy that could generate reasonable population estimates for both minority and general populations.

METHODS

RDS data was collected in Guam in 2013 (n=511) and population estimates were compared with 2012 BRFSS data (n=2031) and the 2010 census data. The estimates were calculated using the unweighted RDS sample and the weighted sample using RDS inference methods and compared with known population characteristics.

RESULTS

The sample size was reached in 23days, providing evidence that the RDS method is a viable, cost-effective data collection method, which can provide reasonable population estimates. However, the results also suggest that the RDS inference methods used to reduce bias, based on self-reported estimates of network sizes, may not always work. Caution is needed when interpreting RDS study findings.

CONCLUSIONS

For a more diverse sample, data collection should not be conducted in just one location. Fewer questions about network estimates should be asked, and more careful consideration should be given to the kind of incentives offered to participants.

摘要

背景

应答驱动抽样(RDS)是一种相对较新的网络抽样技术,通常用于难以接触到的人群。与滚雪球抽样一样,最初的受访者或“种子”会从他们的朋友网络中招募其他受访者。在某些假设下,该方法有望产生一个独立于因“种子”的非随机选择可能引入的偏差的样本。我们使用RDS方法对关岛普通人群的健康传播情况进行了一项调查,这是在关岛首次采用这种方法进行的调查。开展该调查是希望确定一种具有成本效益的非概率抽样策略,该策略能够为少数族裔和普通人群生成合理的总体估计。

方法

2013年在关岛收集了RDS数据(n = 511),并将总体估计与2012年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)数据(n = 2031)以及2010年人口普查数据进行了比较。使用未加权的RDS样本和采用RDS推断方法的加权样本计算估计值,并与已知的总体特征进行比较。

结果

在23天内达到了样本量,这证明RDS方法是一种可行的、具有成本效益的数据收集方法,能够提供合理的总体估计。然而,结果还表明,基于自我报告的网络规模估计来减少偏差的RDS推断方法可能并不总是有效。在解释RDS研究结果时需要谨慎。

结论

为了获得更多样化的样本,数据收集不应仅在一个地点进行。应减少关于网络估计的问题,并应更仔细地考虑给予参与者的激励类型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索