Locatelli Bruno, Lavorel Sandra, Colloff Matthew J, Crouzat Emilie, Bruley Enora, Fedele Giacomo, Grêt-Regamey Adrienne, Plieninger Tobias, Andersson Erik, Abbott Mick, Butler James, Devisscher Tahia, Djoudi Houria, Dubo Titouan, González-García Alberto, Karim Paulina G, Múnera-Roldán Claudia, Neyret Margot, Quétier Fabien, Salliou Nicolas, Walters Gretchen
Forests and Societies, Cirad, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier 34398, France.
Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble 38058, France.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230213. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0213.
Adaptation to climate change is a social-ecological process: it is not solely a result of natural processes or human decisions but emerges from multiple relations within social systems, within ecological systems and between them. We propose a novel analytical framework to evaluate social-ecological relations in nature-based adaptation, encompassing social (people-people), ecological (nature-nature) and social-ecological (people-nature) relations. Applying this framework to 25 case studies, we analyse the associations among these relations and identify archetypes of social-ecological adaptation. Our findings revealed that adaptation actions with more people-nature relations mobilize more social and ecological relations. We identified four archetypes, with distinct modes of adaptation along a gradient of people-nature interaction scores, summarized as: (i) nature control; (ii) biodiversity-based; (iii) ecosystem services-based; and (iv) integrated approaches. This study contributes to a nuanced understanding of nature-based adaptation, highlighting the importance of integrating diverse relations across social and ecological systems. Our findings offer valuable insights for informing the design and implementation of adaptation strategies and policies.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Bending the curve towards nature recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy for a biodiverse future'.
它并非仅仅是自然过程或人类决策的结果,而是源自社会系统内部、生态系统内部以及它们之间的多重关系。我们提出了一个新颖的分析框架,用于评估基于自然的适应中的社会生态关系,该框架涵盖社会(人与人)、生态(自然与自然)以及社会生态(人与自然)关系。将此框架应用于25个案例研究,我们分析了这些关系之间的关联,并确定了社会生态适应的原型。我们的研究结果表明,具有更多人与自然关系的适应行动会调动更多的社会和生态关系。我们确定了四种原型,它们在人与自然互动得分的梯度上具有不同的适应模式,概括如下:(i)自然控制;(ii)基于生物多样性;(iii)基于生态系统服务;以及(iv)综合方法。本研究有助于对基于自然的适应形成细致入微的理解,强调整合社会和生态系统中各种关系的重要性。我们的研究结果为适应战略和政策的设计与实施提供了宝贵的见解。本文是讨论会议议题“向自然恢复转变:以乔治娜·梅斯的遗产为基础,实现生物多样性的未来”的一部分。