Itoshima Ryo, Varendi Heili, Toome Liis, Saik Pille, Axelin Anna, Lehtonen Liisa, Moazami-Goodarzi Ali, Ahlqvist-Björkroth Sari
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54099.
Family-centered care (FCC) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is critical for parental involvement and infant well-being, yet few studies have evaluated the impact of FCC interventions on practice or examined how implementation fidelity may affect these outcomes.
To evaluate the association between the Close Collaboration With Parents intervention and FCC practices and how implementation fidelity may modify these outcomes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nonrandomized clinical trial had a before-and-after design. It was conducted between March 2021 and June 2023 at 6 NICUs in Estonia and included the parents of all newborns and all staff.
Close Collaboration With Parents is an educational intervention for multiprofessional NICU staff including e-learning and bedside practices combined with reflection sessions. It aims to improve FCC culture by developing staff skills in communication and collaboration with parents and parenting support.
The quality of FCC was assessed using a 1-time questionnaire for the parents with 9 questions from the Digi Family-Centered Care-Parent version tool, and daily questions for the staff using Digi Family-Centered Care-Nurse version tool. The association between implementation fidelity, defined as the proportion of staff who completed the full education, and the quality of FCC was also analyzed.
A total of 186 infants (with responses from 186 mothers and 22 fathers) were included in the preintervention period. The median (IQR) gestational age was 37.4 (34.0-39.9) weeks, 94 infants (50.5%) were male, and the median (IQR) parental age was 32 (28-36) years. A total of 208 infants (with responses from 208 mothers and 55 fathers) were included in the postintervention period. The median (IQR) gestational age was 38.1 (35.4-39.9) weeks, 114 infants (55.1%) were male, and median (IQR) parental age was 32 (27-35) years. From the staff, 7448 and 6717 daily responses were analyzed in the preintervention and postintervention periods, respectively. The total rating was significantly higher after the intervention than before, by both the parents (r = 0.07; P < .001) and the staff (r = 0.10; P < .001). The median ratings did not, however, change: the parents' median (IQR) overall rating before and after was 7.0 (6.0-7.0), and the staff's median (IQR) overall rating was 6.0 (5.0-7.0) before and 6.0 (6.0-7.0) after. Implementation fidelity ranged from 4 of 30 health care professionals (13.3%) to 37 of 45 (82.2%) at the NICUs. The NICUs with high fidelity, as opposed to low fidelity, had significantly greater improvement in FCC ratings by the staff after the intervention (β = 2.1 [95% CI, 0.8-3.4]; P = .002).
In this nonrandomized clinical trial, FCC practices were rated higher by the staff and parents after the Close Collaboration With Parents intervention. Implementation fidelity was identified as an important factor.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06258655.
新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中的以家庭为中心的护理(FCC)对于父母的参与和婴儿的福祉至关重要,但很少有研究评估FCC干预措施对实践的影响,或研究实施保真度如何影响这些结果。
评估“与父母密切合作”干预措施与FCC实践之间的关联,以及实施保真度如何改变这些结果。
设计、背景和参与者:这项非随机临床试验采用前后对照设计。于2021年3月至2023年6月在爱沙尼亚的6个新生儿重症监护病房进行,纳入了所有新生儿的父母和所有工作人员。
“与父母密切合作”是一项针对NICU多专业工作人员的教育干预措施,包括电子学习、床边实践以及反思环节。其目的是通过培养工作人员与父母沟通、协作及提供育儿支持的技能,来改善FCC文化。
使用来自“数字家庭中心护理-家长版”工具的9个问题的一次性问卷对父母进行FCC质量评估,并使用“数字家庭中心护理-护士版”工具对工作人员进行每日问题评估。还分析了实施保真度(定义为完成全部教育的工作人员比例)与FCC质量之间的关联。
干预前期共纳入186名婴儿(收到186名母亲和22名父亲的回复)。中位(四分位间距)胎龄为37.4(34.0 - 39.9)周,94名婴儿(50.5%)为男性,父母中位(四分位间距)年龄为32(28 - 36)岁。干预后期共纳入208名婴儿(收到208名母亲和55名父亲的回复)。中位(四分位间距)胎龄为38.1(35.4 - 39.9)周,114名婴儿(55.1%)为男性,父母中位(四分位间距)年龄为32(27 - 35)岁。在工作人员方面,干预前期和后期分别分析了7448条和6717条每日回复。干预后,父母(r = 0.07;P <.001)和工作人员(r = 0.10;P <.001)给出的总评分均显著高于干预前。然而,中位评分并未改变:父母的中位(四分位间距)总体评分干预前后均为7.0(6.0 - 7.0),工作人员的中位(四分位间距)总体评分干预前为6.0(5.0 - 7.0),干预后为6.0(6.0 - 7.0)。各新生儿重症监护病房的实施保真度从30名医护人员中的4名(13.3%)到45名中的37名(82.2%)不等。与低保真度的新生儿重症监护病房相比,高保真度的病房在干预后工作人员对FCC的评分改善显著更大(β = 2.1 [95% CI,0.8 - 3.4];P =.002)。
在这项非随机临床试验中,“与父母密切合作”干预措施实施后,工作人员和父母对FCC实践的评分更高。实施保真度被确定为一个重要因素。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06258655。