Updates on Methods for Body Composition Analysis: Implications for Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND

Recent technological advances have introduced novel methods for measuring body composition, each with unique benefits and limitations. The choice of method often depends on the trade-offs between accuracy, cost, participant burden, and the ability to measure specific body composition compartments.

OBJECTIVE

To review the considerations of cost, accuracy, portability, and participant burden in reference and emerging body composition assessment methods, and to evaluate their clinical applicability.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted comparing traditional reference methods like dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) with emerging technologies such as smartphone camera applications, three-dimensional optical imaging scanners, smartwatch bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA), and ultrasound.

RESULTS

Reference methods like CT and MRI offer high accuracy and the ability to distinguish between specific body composition compartments (e.g., visceral, subcutaneous, skeletal muscle mass, and adipose tissue within lean mass) but are expensive and non-portable. Conversely, emerging methods, such as smartwatch BIA and smartphone-based technologies, provide greater accessibility and lower participant burden but with reduced accuracy. Methods like three-dimensional optical imaging scanners balance portability and accuracy, presenting promising potential for population-level applications.

CONCLUSIONS

The selection of a body composition assessment method should be guided by the clinical context and specific application, considering trade-offs in cost, accuracy, and portability. Emerging methods provide valuable options for population-level assessments, while reference methods remain essential for detailed compartmental analysis.