Suppr超能文献

通过多项全基因组关联分析识别双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症之间的基因差异。

Identifying genetic differences between bipolar disorder and major depression through multiple genome-wide association analyses.

作者信息

Panagiotaropoulou Georgia, Hellberg Kajsa-Lotta Georgii, Coleman Jonathan R I, Seok Darsol, Kalman Janos, Mitchell Philip B, Schofield Peter R, Forstner Andreas J, Bauer Michael, Scott Laura J, Pato Carlos N, Pato Michele T, Li Qingqin S, Kirov George, Landén Mikael, Jonsson Lina, Müller-Myhsok Bertram, Smoller Jordan W, Binder Elisabeth B, Brückl Tanja M, Czamara Darina, Van der Auwera Sandra, Grabe Hans J, Homuth Georg, Schmidt Carsten O, Potash James B, DePaulo J Raymond, Goes Fernando S, MacKinnon Dean F, Mondimore Francis M, Weissman Myrna M, Shi Jianxin, Frye Mark A, Biernacka Joanna M, Reif Andreas, Witt Stephanie H, Kahn René R, Boks Marco M, Owen Michael J, Gordon-Smith Katherine, Mitchell Brittany L, Martin Nicholas G, Medland Sarah E, Jones Lisa, Knowles James A, Levinson Douglas F, O'Donovan Michael C, Lewis Cathryn M, Breen Gerome, Werge Thomas, Schork Andrew J, Ophoff Roel A, Ripke Stephan, Olde Loohuis Loes

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

Institute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Center Sct Hans, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;226(2):79-90. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.125. Epub 2025 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BPD) is difficult in clinical practice, with an average delay between symptom onset and diagnosis of about 7 years. A depressive episode often precedes the first manic episode, making it difficult to distinguish BPD from unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD).

AIMS

We use genome-wide association analyses (GWAS) to identify differential genetic factors and to develop predictors based on polygenic risk scores (PRS) that may aid early differential diagnosis.

METHOD

Based on individual genotypes from case-control cohorts of BPD and MDD shared through the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, we compile case-case-control cohorts, applying a careful quality control procedure. In a resulting cohort of 51 149 individuals (15 532 BPD patients, 12 920 MDD patients and 22 697 controls), we perform a variety of GWAS and PRS analyses.

RESULTS

Although our GWAS is not well powered to identify genome-wide significant loci, we find significant chip heritability and demonstrate the ability of the resulting PRS to distinguish BPD from MDD, including BPD cases with depressive onset (BPD-D). We replicate our PRS findings in an independent Danish cohort (iPSYCH 2015, = 25 966). We observe strong genetic correlation between our case-case GWAS and that of case-control BPD.

CONCLUSIONS

We find that MDD and BPD, including BPD-D are genetically distinct. Our findings support that controls, MDD and BPD patients primarily lie on a continuum of genetic risk. Future studies with larger and richer samples will likely yield a better understanding of these findings and enable the development of better genetic predictors distinguishing BPD and, importantly, BPD-D from MDD.

摘要

背景

在临床实践中,双相情感障碍(BPD)的准确诊断具有挑战性,症状出现与诊断之间的平均延迟约为7年。抑郁发作通常先于首次躁狂发作,这使得难以将BPD与单相重度抑郁症(MDD)区分开来。

目的

我们使用全基因组关联分析(GWAS)来识别差异遗传因素,并基于多基因风险评分(PRS)开发预测指标,以辅助早期鉴别诊断。

方法

基于通过精神基因组学联盟共享的BPD和MDD病例对照队列的个体基因型,我们编制了病例-病例-对照队列,并应用了严格的质量控制程序。在一个由51149名个体组成的队列中(15532名BPD患者、12920名MDD患者和22697名对照),我们进行了各种GWAS和PRS分析。

结果

尽管我们的GWAS识别全基因组显著位点的能力不足,但我们发现了显著的芯片遗传力,并证明了所得PRS能够区分BPD和MDD,包括以抑郁发作为起始的BPD病例(BPD-D)。我们在一个独立的丹麦队列(iPSYCH 2015,n = 25966)中重复了我们的PRS研究结果。我们观察到病例-病例GWAS与病例对照BPD的GWAS之间存在很强的遗传相关性。

结论

我们发现MDD和BPD,包括BPD-D在遗传上是不同的。我们的研究结果支持,对照、MDD和BPD患者主要处于遗传风险的连续体上。未来使用更大、更丰富样本的研究可能会更好地理解这些发现,并能够开发出更好的遗传预测指标,以区分BPD,重要的是区分BPD-D和MDD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验