Edmonds James, Zhao Xin, Patel Pralit, Sheng Di, Lochner Ellie, Bertram Christoph, Iyer Gokul, Westphal Michael, Fawcett Allen, Waldhoff Stephanie
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Global Change Research Institute, 5825 University Research Court, Suite 3500, College Park, MD 3500, USA.
Center for Global Sustainability (CGS), School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, Thurgood Marshall Hall, 7805 Regents Drive, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
iScience. 2024 Nov 22;28(1):111449. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111449. eCollection 2025 Jan 17.
In this paper we contribute to a long history of research studying interactions between energy systems, international energy trade, and macroeconomic activity. We develop and employ methods to quantify transmission pathways for energy markets to affect the macroeconomy and CO emissions. We track the long-term consequences of a hypothetical permanent disruption to global energy markets, cession of Russian fossil fuel exports, for energy markets, regional and global economic activity (gross domestic product [GDP]), labor and capital markets, and CO emissions against two dramatically different reference scenarios. Relative to our first reference scenario, we find that fossil fuel exports contribute roughly one-half-trillion dollars/year to Russian GDP in 2050. We find that by 2050 global GDP is largely unaffected by the loss of Russian fossil fuel exports with all the benefits accruing to non-Russian energy exports, e.g., the Middle East. We track transmission mechanisms including net exports, energy services, and capital and labor market feedback.
在本文中,我们为研究能源系统、国际能源贸易与宏观经济活动之间相互作用的悠久研究历史做出了贡献。我们开发并运用方法来量化能源市场影响宏观经济和碳排放的传导途径。我们针对两种截然不同的参考情景,追踪全球能源市场假设的永久性中断(俄罗斯化石燃料出口中断)对能源市场、区域和全球经济活动(国内生产总值[GDP])、劳动力和资本市场以及碳排放的长期影响。相对于我们的第一个参考情景,我们发现到2050年,化石燃料出口每年为俄罗斯GDP贡献约5000亿美元。我们发现,到2050年,全球GDP在很大程度上不受俄罗斯化石燃料出口损失的影响,所有好处都归于非俄罗斯能源出口国,例如中东地区。我们追踪了包括净出口、能源服务以及资本和劳动力市场反馈在内的传导机制。