Khonsanit A, Thanakitpipattana D, Mongkolsamrit S, Kobmoo N, Phosrithong N, Samson R A, Crous P W, Luangsa-Ard J J
Plant Microbe Interaction Research Team, BIOTEC, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) 111 Thailand Science Park, Phahonyothin Road, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Forest Entomology and Microbiology Research Group, Forest and Plant Conservation Research Office, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, 61 Phahonyothin Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Fungal Syst Evol. 2024 Dec;14:271-305. doi: 10.3114/fuse.2024.14.17. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
During entomopathogenic fungal surveys conducted in Thailand, 15 specimens tentatively classified under were identified. To gain a comprehensive understanding of their taxonomy, molecular phylogenies using combined LSU, , , and sequence data, together with morphological examination of several spp. from previous studies were conducted. The analyses revealed distinct clades representing independent lineages within the . These clades were further characterized by different asexual morph types and the respective hosts they parasitize. In this context, we resurrected the genus to accommodate 12 known species previously classified under , found on diverse hosts. We propose four new genera - , , , and from species previously identified as . Notably, certain species associated with spiders and parasitic on were reclassified into the new genera and , respectively. Moreover, we introduce four novel species in found across a diverse range of moth families: , , , and . Additionally, we provide descriptions and illustrations of the sexual morph linked to and , along with a second type of synnemata seen in and . To assist with their identification, keys to the genera , , and are provided, but should not be used to replace molecular identification. Khonsanit A, Thanakitpipattana D, Mongkolsamrit S, Kobmoo N, Phosrithong N, Samson RA, Crous PW, Luangsa-ard JJ (2024). A phylogenetic assessment of in (, ): introduction of new genera, and the resurrection of . : 271-305. doi: 10.3114/fuse.2024.14.17.
在泰国进行昆虫病原真菌调查期间,鉴定出了15个暂归为[具体分类]的标本。为全面了解它们的分类学,利用核糖体大亚基(LSU)、[其他基因序列名称1]、[其他基因序列名称2]和[其他基因序列名称3]的组合序列数据进行了分子系统发育分析,并对先前研究中的几个[物种名称]进行了形态学检查。分析揭示了代表[真菌类群名称]内独立谱系的不同分支。这些分支进一步以不同的无性形态类型及其寄生的相应宿主为特征。在此背景下,我们恢复了[属名1]属,以容纳先前归为[另一属名]的12个已知物种,这些物种寄生于多种宿主。我们从先前鉴定为[原属名]的物种中提出了四个新属——[新属名1]、[新属名2]、[新属名3]和[新属名4]。值得注意的是,某些与蜘蛛相关且寄生于[宿主名称]的[物种名称]物种分别被重新分类到新属[新属名5]和[新属名6]中。此外,我们在多个蛾科中发现了四个新物种:[新物种名1]、[新物种名2]、[新物种名3]和[新物种名4]。此外,我们提供了与[物种名称1]和[物种名称2]相关的有性形态的描述和图示,以及在[物种名称3]和[物种名称4]中看到的第二种类型的分生孢子座。为便于鉴定,提供了[属名1]、[属名2]和[属名3]的检索表,但不应将其用于替代分子鉴定。 孔萨尼特·A、塔纳基特皮帕塔纳·D、蒙科萨姆里特·S、科布穆·N、福斯里通·N、萨姆森·R·A、克劳斯·P·W、琅莎 - 阿德·J·J(2024年)。[真菌类群名称]在[具体分类]中的系统发育评估:新属的引入及[属名1]的恢复。《[期刊名称]》:271 - 305页。doi: 10.3114/fuse.2024.14.17 。