Foryciarz Agata, Gladish Nicole, Rehkopf David H, Rose Sherri
Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, United States.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Mar 1;32(3):595-601. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf009.
The inclusion of social drivers of health (SDOH) into predictive algorithms of health outcomes has potential for improving algorithm interpretation, performance, generalizability, and transportability. However, there are limitations in the availability, understanding, and quality of SDOH variables, as well as a lack of guidance on how to incorporate them into algorithms when appropriate to do so. As such, few published algorithms include SDOH, and there is substantial methodological variability among those that do. We argue that practitioners should consider the use of social indices and factors-a class of area-level measurements-given their accessibility, transparency, and quality.
We illustrate the process of using such indices in predictive algorithms, which includes the selection of appropriate indices for the outcome, measurement time, and geographic level, in a demonstrative example with the Kidney Failure Risk Equation.
Identifying settings where incorporating SDOH may be beneficial and incorporating them rigorously can help validate algorithms and assess generalizability.
将健康的社会驱动因素(SDOH)纳入健康结果预测算法中,有可能改善算法的解释、性能、通用性和可移植性。然而,SDOH变量在可用性、理解和质量方面存在局限性,并且在如何在适当的时候将它们纳入算法方面缺乏指导。因此,很少有已发表的算法包含SDOH,而包含SDOH的算法在方法上存在很大差异。我们认为,鉴于社会指数和因素(一类区域层面的测量指标)具有可获取性、透明度和质量,从业者应考虑使用它们。
我们在一个使用肾衰竭风险方程的示范示例中,阐述了在预测算法中使用此类指数的过程,其中包括为结果、测量时间和地理层面选择合适的指数。
确定纳入SDOH可能有益的环境并严格纳入这些因素,有助于验证算法并评估通用性。