Blok Siebe G, Pisani Luigi, Estenssoro Elisa, Ferreira Juliana Carvalho, Botta Michela, Motos Ana, Martin-Loeches Ignacio, Torres Antoni, Schultz Marcus J, Paulus Frederique, van Meenen David M P
Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2025 Jan 21;112(4):875-882. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0257. Print 2025 Apr 2.
Epidemiology, ventilator management, and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been described extensively but have never been compared between countries. We performed an individual patient data analysis of four observational studies to compare epidemiology, ventilator management, and outcomes. We used propensity score weighting to control for confounding factors. The analysis included 6,702 patients: 1,500 from Argentina, 844 from Brazil, 975 from the Netherlands, and 3,383 from Spain. There were substantial differences in baseline characteristics between countries. There were small differences in ventilation management. Intensive care unit mortality was higher in Argentina and Brazil compared with the Netherlands and Spain (59.6% and 56.6% versus 32.1% and 34.7%; P <0.001). The median number of days free from ventilation and alive at day 28 was equally low (0 [0-7], 0 [0-18], 1 [0-16], and 0 [0-16] days, respectively; P = 0.03), and the median number of days free from ventilation and alive at day 60 was higher in the Netherlands and Spain (0 [0-37], 0 [0-50], 33 [0-48], and 26 [0-48] days, respectively; P <0.001). Propensity score matching confirmed the outcome differences. Thus, the outcome of COVID-19 ARDS patients in Argentina and Brazil was substantially worse compared with that of patients in the Netherlands and Spain. It is unlikely that this results from differences in case mix or ventilation management.
关于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的流行病学、呼吸机管理及预后情况已有大量描述,但各国之间从未进行过比较。我们对四项观察性研究进行了个体患者数据分析,以比较流行病学、呼吸机管理及预后情况。我们使用倾向评分加权法来控制混杂因素。该分析纳入了6702例患者:1500例来自阿根廷,844例来自巴西,975例来自荷兰,3383例来自西班牙。各国之间的基线特征存在显著差异。通气管理方面存在细微差异。与荷兰和西班牙相比,阿根廷和巴西重症监护病房的死亡率更高(分别为59.6%和56.6%,而荷兰和西班牙为32.1%和34.7%;P<0.001)。第28天无通气且存活的天数中位数同样较低(分别为0[0 - 7]天、0[0 - 18]天、1[0 - 16]天和0[0 - 16]天;P = 0.03),而第60天无通气且存活的天数中位数在荷兰和西班牙更高(分别为0[0 - 37]天、0[0 - 50]天、33[0 - 48]天和26[0 - 48]天;P<0.001)。倾向评分匹配证实了预后差异。因此,与荷兰和西班牙的患者相比,阿根廷和巴西COVID-19 ARDS患者的预后明显更差。这不太可能是由于病例组合或通气管理的差异所致。