Maier Isabelle, Kienzle Ellen
Animal Nutrition and Dietetics, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Schoenleutnerstr. 8, D-85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany.
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 13;15(2):191. doi: 10.3390/ani15020191.
The goal of this meta-analysis was to (i) identify any potential differences in the apparent and true digestibility, renal excretion, and retention between ponies and horses and (ii) examine the impact of work on these parameters. Additionally, the study aimed to (iii) evaluate the effects of water deficiency. This meta-analysis used data from 33 studies and plotted them in diagrams similar to the Lucas test against mineral intake. Three studies involved ponies that were later diagnosed with pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID). These were compared with other data to identify quantitative differences, as they may have clinical significance. If any significant difference was observed, the data were not used for the evaluation of the aforementioned goals. Data were compared within certain intake ranges using -tests and ANOVA, followed by Holm-Sidak post hoc tests. Working equines showed significantly higher apparent and true Na digestibility and lower endogenous faecal Na losses compared to non-working ponies and horses, suggesting a rather important role of the gastrointestinal tract in the regulation of Na metabolism in equines. The true K digestibility was also significantly higher in working animals than in non-working ones, but the differences were quantitatively smaller than for Na. Retention plus sweat losses for Na, K and Cl were higher in working animals compared to equines in maintenance. Horses showed higher Na and K retention plus sweat losses compared to ponies. These effects are likely attributable to greater sweat losses in working equines, particularly horses. The apparent and true Cl digestibility was significantly higher in ponies than in horses. A clinical relevance of this observation is rather unlikely, as the digestibility remained very high in both. Water deprivation influenced serum Cl levels and increased renal K excretion, which subsequently led to reduced K retention. Compared to other animal species, no effects on blood K levels or Na metabolism were observed. The ponies diagnosed with PPID exhibited a significantly lower apparent K digestibility compared to healthy animals, which could be an important factor to consider when feeding soaked hay, due to potential electrolyte losses during soaking.
(i)确定矮种马和马在表观消化率、真消化率、肾脏排泄及潴留方面的任何潜在差异;(ii)研究运动对这些参数的影响。此外,该研究旨在:(iii)评估缺水的影响。本荟萃分析使用了33项研究的数据,并将其绘制在类似于针对矿物质摄入量的卢卡斯试验的图表中。三项研究涉及后来被诊断为垂体中间叶功能障碍(PPID)的矮种马。将这些数据与其他数据进行比较以确定定量差异,因为它们可能具有临床意义。如果观察到任何显著差异,则这些数据不用于评估上述目标。在特定的摄入量范围内,使用t检验和方差分析对数据进行比较,随后进行霍尔姆-西达克事后检验。与不运动的矮种马和马相比,运动的马表现出显著更高的钠表观消化率和真消化率,以及更低的内源性粪便钠损失,这表明胃肠道在马的钠代谢调节中起着相当重要的作用。运动动物的钾真消化率也显著高于不运动的动物,但差异在数量上小于钠。与维持状态的马相比,运动动物的钠、钾和氯的潴留量加上汗液流失量更高。与矮种马相比,马的钠和钾潴留量加上汗液流失量更高。这些影响可能归因于运动的马,尤其是马,汗液流失量更大。矮种马的氯表观消化率和真消化率显著高于马。这一观察结果的临床相关性不太可能存在,因为两者的消化率都仍然很高。缺水影响血清氯水平并增加肾脏钾排泄,随后导致钾潴留减少。与其他动物物种相比,未观察到对血钾水平或钠代谢的影响。与健康动物相比,被诊断为PPID的矮种马表现出显著更低的钾表观消化率,由于浸泡过程中可能存在电解质损失,这在喂食浸泡干草时可能是一个需要考虑的重要因素。